Psychometric properties of the Recovery Experiences Questionnaire in Argentine workers.

• Trógolo, Mario ^[1] ; Morera, Luis ^[1] ; Castellano, Estanislao Joaquín ; Spontón, Carlos ^[1] ; Medrano, Leonardo Adrián ^[2]
  1. [1] Universidad Empresarial Siglo 21

     Universidad Empresarial Siglo 21

     Argentina

     
  2. [2] Universidad Nacional de Córdoba

     Universidad Nacional de Córdoba

     Argentina

     
• Localización: Anales de psicología, ISSN-e 1695-2294, ISSN 0212-9728, Vol. 36, Nº. 1, 2020 (Ejemplar dedicado a: January - April), págs. 181-188
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.6018/analesps.352761
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Propiedades psicométricas del Cuestionario de Experiencias de Recuperación en trabajadores argentinos.
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Dialnet Métricas: 5 Citas
• Resumen
  • español

    El objetivo de este estudio consistió en examinar las propiedades psicométricas del “Cuestionario de Experiencias de Recuperación” para su uso en Argentina. La muestra estuvo compuesta por 505 trabajadores provenientes del sector público, privado y organizaciones no gubernamentales. Los resultados del análisis factorial confirmatorio evidenciaron que un modelo de cuatro factores ─distanciamiento psicológico del trabajo, relajación, búsqueda de retos y control sobre el tiempo libre─ presentó un buen ajuste a los datos. Por lo tanto, el cuestionario mantiene la misma estructura que la escala original. Los análisis de confiabilidad mostraron que la escala posee una adecuada consistencia interna (α = .75 - .92) y fiabilidad de constructo (H = .88 - .93). Se obtuvieron correlaciones teóricamente esperadas con medidas de burnout, work engagement y afecto negativo, aportando de esta manera evidencias externas de validez concurrente. En conclusión, la escala posee adecuadas propiedades psicométricas para ser utilizada en el contexto argentino, permitiendo disponer de un instrumento confiable que permite profundizar el conocimiento sobre la recuperación y brindando una herramienta valiosa para la práctica profesional.

  • English

    The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire in Argentina. Five-hundred and five workers from public, private and non-governmental sectors participated in the study. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the four-factor model has acceptable fit to the data. Thus, as the original scale, the Argentinean validation maintain the four recovery experiences—psychological detachment from work, relaxation, mastery experiences and control over leisure time. Reliability analyses showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α ranging from .75 to .92) and construct reliability (coefficient H ranging from .88 to .93) for all subscales. Correlations theoretically expected with measures of work engagement, burnout and negative affect supported for concurrent validity. Thus, the Recovery Experience Questionnaire shows adequate psychometric properties for its use in Argentina, make available a reliable instrument that allows deepening knowledge about recovery and providing a valuable tool for professional practice.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Almén, N., Lundberg, H., Sundin, Ö., & Jansson, B. (2018). The reliability and factorial validity of the Swedish version of the Recovery...
  • Arias, B. (2008). Desarrollo de un ejemplo de análisis factorial confirmatorio con LISREL, AMOS y SAS. En M. A. Verdugo, M. Crespo, M. Badía...
  • Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2013). La teoría de las demandas y los recursos laborales. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,...
  • Bakker, A., Sanz-Vergel, A., Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., & Oerlemans, W. (2015). The state version of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire:...
  • Carod-Artal, F. J., & Vázquez-Cabrera, C. (2012). Burnout Syndrome in an international setting. In S. Bahrer-Kohler (Ed.), Burnout for...
  • Castellano, E., Muñoz-Navarro, R., Toledo, M., Spontón, C., & Medrano, L. A. (2019). Cognitive processes of emotional regulation, burnout...
  • Chahín-Pinzón, N. (2014). Aspectos a tener en cuenta cuando se realiza una adaptación de test entre diferentes culturas. Psychologia: Avances...
  • Colombo, V., & Cifre Gallego, E. (2012). La importancia de recuperarse del trabajo: Una revisión del dónde, cómo y por qué. Papeles del...
  • De Bloom, J., Geurts, S. A., & Kompier, M. A. (2013). Vacation (after-) effects on employee health and well-being, and the role of vacation...
  • de Vries, J., van Hoff, M., Geurts, S., & Kompier, M. (2018). Trajectories of well‐being during an exercise randomized controlled trial:...
  • Demerouti, E., Bakker, A., Geurts, S., & Taris, T. (2009). Daily recovery from workrelated effort during non-work time. Current Perspectives...
  • Dominguez-Lara, S. (2016). Evaluación de la confiabilidad del constructo mediante el Coeficiente H: Breve revisión conceptual y aplicaciones....
  • Etzion, D., Eden, D., & Lapidot, Y. (1998). Relief from job stressors and burnout: Reserve service as a respite. Journal of Applied Psychology,...
  • Fritz, C., Sonnentag, S., Spector, P., & McInroe, J. (2010). The weekend matters: Relationships between stress recovery and affective...
  • Fritz, C., Yankelevich, M., Zarubin, A., & Barger, P. (2010). Happy, healthy, and productive: The role of detachment from work during...
  • Furr, M. (2011). Scale construction and psychometrics for social and personality psychology. London: Sage.
  • Garrosa, E., Carmona-Cobo, I., Moreno-Jiménez, B., & Sanz-Vergel, A. (2015). El impacto emocional del incivismo laboral y el abuso verbal...
  • Geurts, S., & Sonnentag, S. (2006). Recovery as an explanatory mechanism in the relation between acute stress reactions and chronic health...
  • Hahn, V. C., Binnewies, C., Sonnentag, S., & Mojza, E. J. (2011). Learning how to recover from job stress: Effects of a recovery training...
  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1998). Stress, Culture, and Community. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-0115- 6
  • Kinnunen, U., Feldt, T., Siltaloppi, M., & Sonnentag, S. (2011). Job demands–resources model in the context of recovery: Testing recovery...
  • Li, C. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares....
  • Maffei, L., Spontón, C., Spontón, M., Castellano, E., & Medrano, L. A. (2012). Adaptación del Cuestionario de Autoeficacia Profesional...
  • Medrano, L. A., & Trógolo, M. (2018). Employee well-being and life satisfaction in argentina: The contribution of psychological detachment...
  • Meijman, Th., & Mulder, G. (1998). Psychological aspects of workload. In P. J. Drenth & H. Thierry (Eds.), Handbook of work and organizational...
  • Mojza, E., Lorenz, C., Sonnentag, S., & Binnewies, C. (2010). Daily recovery experiences:
  • Moreno-Jiménez, B., & Gálvez Herrer, M. (2013). El efecto del distanciamiento psicológico del trabajo en el bienestar y la satisfacción...
  • Moriondo, M., Palma, P., Medrano, L., & Murillo, P. (2011). Adaptación de la Escala de Afectividad Positiva y Negativa (PANAS) a la población...
  • Mostert, K., & Els, C. (2015). The psychometric properties of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire of employees in a higher education...
  • Park, H., Park, Y., Kim, M., & Hur, T. (2011). A validation study of a Korean version of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire. Korean...
  • Parkinson, B., & Totterdell, P. (1999). Classifying affect-regulation strategies. Cognition & Emotion, 13, 277–303. doi: 10.1080/026999399379285...
  • Ready, R., Weinberger, M., & Jones, K. (2007). How happy have you felt lately? Two diary studies of emotion recall in older and younger...
  • Robinson, M., & Clore, G. (2002). Belief and feeling: evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin,...
  • Rodriguez-Ayan, M., & Sotelo Rico, M. (2015). Validación de la versión en español del Mathematics Value Inventory (MVI) entre estudiantes...
  • Sanz-Vergel, A. I., Sebastián, J., Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., Garrosa, E., Moreno-Jiménez, B., & Sonnentag, S. (2010). Adaptación del “Cuestionario...
  • Schaufeli, W., Leiter, M., & Maslach, C. (2009). Burnout: 35 years of research and practice. Career Development International, 14, 204─220....
  • Schaufeli, W., Leiter, M., Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. (1996). Maslach Burnout Inventory ─ General Survey. In C. Maslach, S. Jackson, &...
  • Schaufeli, W., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. (2002). The measurement of burnout and engagement: A confirmatory factor...
  • Shimazu, A., Matsudaira, K., De Jonge, J., Tosaka, N., Watanabe, K., & Takahashi, M. (2016). Psychological detachment from work during...
  • Shimazu, A., Sonnentag, S., Kubota, K., & Kawakami, N. (2012). Validation of the Japanese version of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire....
  • Siltaloppi, M., Kinnunen, U., & Feldt, T. (2009). Recovery experiences as moderators between psychological work characteristics and occupational...
  • Sonnentag, S. (2001). Work, recovery activities, and individual well-being: A diary study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 196–210....
  • Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2007). The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation...
  • Sonnentag, S., & Geurts, S. A. (2009). Methodological issues in recovery research. In Current perspectives on job-stress recovery (pp....
  • Sonnentag, S., & Schiffner, C. (2019) Psychological detachment from work during nonwork time and employee well-being: The role of leader’s...
  • Sonnentag, S., & Zijlstra, F. (2006). Job characteristics and off-job activities as predictors of need for recovery, well-being, and fatigue....
  • Sonnentag, S., Binnewies, C., & Mojza, E. (2008). "Did you have a nice evening?" A day-level study on recovery experiences, sleep,...
  • Sonnentag, S., Kuttler, I., & Fritz, C. (2010). Job stressors, emotional exhaustion, and need for recovery: A multi-source study on the...
  • Sonnentag, S., Mojza, E., Binnewies, C., & Scholl, A. (2008). Being engaged at work and detached at home: A week-level study on work engagement,...
  • Sonnentag, S., Venz, L., & Casper, A. (2017). Advances in recovery research: What have we learned? What should be done next? Journal of...
  • Spontón, C., Medrano, L. A., Maffei, L., Spontón, M., & Castellano, E. (2012). Validación del cuestionario de Engagement UWES a la población...
  • Spontón, C., Trógolo, M., Castellano, E., & Medrano, L. A. (2019). Medición del burnout: Estructura factorial, validez y confiabilidad...
  • Syrek, C., Weigelt, O., Kühnel, J., & de Bloom, J. (2018). All I want for Christmas is recovery – changes in employee affective well-being...
  • Ten Brummelhuis, L., & Bakker, A. (2012). Staying engaged during the week: The effect of off-job activities on next day work engagement....
  • Watson, D., & Clark, L. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form. Ames: The University...
  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS...
  • Wendsche, J., & Lohmann-Haislah, A. (2017). A meta-analysis on antecedents and outcomes of detachment from work. Frontiers in Psychology,...
  • Yu, C., & Muthén, B. (2002). Evaluation of model fit indices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes (Technical...