Promoting learning by leveraging the collaborative nature of formative peer assessment with instructional scaffolds

• Autores: Jan-Willem Strijbos, Astrid Wichmann
• Localización: European Journal of Psychology of Education, ISSN-e 1878-5174, ISSN 0256-2928, Vol. 33, Nº 1, 2018 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Promoting learning by leveraging the collaborative nature of formative peer assessment with instructional scaffolds / coord. por Jan-Willem Strijbos, Astrid Wichmann), págs. 1-9
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.1007/s10212-017-0353-x
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Dialnet Métricas: 2 Citas
• Resumen

  • Over the past two decades, formative peer assessment has become a popular instructional approach. Initially, it was more readily applied in higher education but has since expanded to other educational levels, including primary and secondary education. The popularity is understandable given the increased amount of feedback by multiple peers and enhanced awareness of performance criteria. Although it is increasingly acknowledged by the research community that formative peer assessment is inherently a social endeavour, the collaborative nature is simultaneously the least-explored mechanism. The contributions in this special issue address this gap conceptualising peer assessment and peer feedback as both an individual and a collaborative learning practice. Furthermore, we highlight core learning conditions: learner characteristics, domain and task characteristics, and, finally, instructional scaffolds.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Alqassab, M., Strijbos, J. W., & Ufer, U. (2018). Training peer-feedback skills on geometric construction tasks: role of domain knowledge...
  • Ashenafi, M. M. (2017). Peer-assessment in higher education—twenty-first century practices, challenges and the way forward. Assessment &...
  • Berndt, M., Strijbos, J. W., & Fischer, F. (2018). Effects of written peer-feedback content and sender’s competence on perceptions, performance,...
  • De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2011). Assessing collaboration in a wiki: the reliability of university students’...
  • Deiglmayr, A. (2018). Instructional scaffolds for learning from formative peer assessment: effects of core task, peer feedback, and dialogue....
  • Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks....
  • Gielen, M., & De Wever, B. (2015). Structuring the peer assessment process: a multilevel approach for the impact on product improvement...
  • Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, L., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning...
  • Gielen, S., Dochy, F., & Onghena, P. (2011). An inventory of peer assessment diversity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,...
  • Gillies, R. M. (2007). Cooperative learning: integrating theory and practice. Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Hoogeveen, M., & Van Gelderen, A. (2013). What works in writing with peer response? A review of intervention studies with children and...
  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone: cooperative, competitive and individualistic learning (4th ed.)....
  • Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2010). Peer assessment as collaborative learning: a cognitive perspective. Learning and Instruction, 20(4),...
  • Lejk, M., Wyvill, M., & Farrow, S. (1996). A survey of methods of deriving individual grades from group assessments. Assessment &...
  • Leenknecht, M. J. M., & Prins, F. J. (2018). Formative peer assessment in primary school: the effects of involving pupils in setting assessment...
  • Li, H., Xiong, Y., Zang, X., Kornhaber, M. L., Lyu, Y., Chung, K. S., & Suen, H. K. (2016). Peer assessment in the digital age: a meta-analysis...
  • Luxton-Reilly, A. (2009). A systematic review of tools that support peer assessment. Computer Science Education, 19(4), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993400903384844.
  • Panadero, E. (2016). Is it safe? Social, interpersonal, and human effects of peer assessment: a review and future directions. In G. T. L....
  • Panadero, E., Romero, M., & Strijbos, J. W. (2013). The impact of a rubric and friendship on peer assessment: effects on construct validity,...
  • Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Strijbos, J. W. (2016). Scaffolding self-regulated learning through self-assessment and peer assessment:...
  • Peters, O., Körndle, H., & Narciss, S. (2018). Effects of a formative assessment script on how vocational students generate formative...
  • Ploegh, K., Tillema, H. H., & Segers, M. S. R. (2010). In search of quality criteria in peer assessment practices. Studies in Educational...
  • Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., & Schellens, T. (2018). Anonymity as an instructional scaffold in peer assessment: its effects on peer feedback...
  • Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., Schellens, T., & Raes, A. (in press). “Now you know what you’re doing right and wrong!” Peer feedback quality...
  • Saunders, W. (1989). Collaborative writing tasks and peer interaction. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90019-0.
  • Sluijsmans, D., Dochy, F., & Moerkerke, G. (1999). Creating a learning environment by using self-, peer- and co-assessment. Learning Environments...
  • Strijbos, J. W. (2011). Assessment of (computer-supported) collaborative learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 4(1), 59–73....
  • Strijbos, J. W. (2016). Assessment of collaborative learning. In G. T. L. Brown & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of social and human conditions...
  • Strijbos, J. W., & Sluijsmans, D. (2010). Unravelling peer assessment: methodological, functional, and conceptual developments. Learning...
  • Strijbos, J. W., Ochoa, T. A., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2009). Fostering interactivity through formative...
  • Tillema, H., Leenknecht, M., & Segers, M. (2011). Assessing assessment quality: criteria for quality assurance in design of (peer) assessment...
  • Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276 http://www.jstor.org/stable/1170598.
  • Topping, K. (2003). Self and peer assessment in school and university: reliability, validity and utility. In M. Segers, F. Dochy, & E....
  • Tsivitanidou, O. E., Constantinou, C. P., Labudde, P., Rönnebeck, S. & Ropohl, M. (2018). Reciprocal peer assessment as a learning tool...
  • Van Aalst, J. (2013). Assessment in collaborative learning. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, C. A. Chinn, C. K. K. Chan, & A. O’Donnell (Eds.),...
  • Van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W., & Pilot, A. (2006). Design principles and outcomes of peer assessment in higher education. Studies in...
  • Van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2009). Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: the influence...
  • Van Popta, E., Kral, M., Camp, G., Martens, R. L., & Simons, P. R. J. (2017). Exploring the value of peer feedback in online learning...
  • Van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: research findings and...
  • Voet, M., Gielen, M., Boelens, R., & De Wever, B. (2018). Using feedback requests to actively involve assessees in peer assessment: effects...
  • Wichmann, A., Funk, A., &; Rummel, N. (2018). Leveraging the potential of peer feedback in an academic writing activity through sense-making...