Training peer-feedback skills on geometric construction tasks: Role of domain knowledge and peer-feedback levels

• Autores: Maryam Alqassab, Jan-Willem Strijbos, Stefan Ufer
• Localización: European Journal of Psychology of Education, ISSN-e 1878-5174, ISSN 0256-2928, Vol. 33, Nº 1, 2018 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Promoting learning by leveraging the collaborative nature of formative peer assessment with instructional scaffolds / coord. por Jan-Willem Strijbos, Astrid Wichmann), págs. 11-30
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.1007/s10212-017-0342-0
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Dialnet Métricas: 3 Citas
• Resumen

  • Peer feedback is widely used to train assessment skills and to support collaborative learning of various learning tasks, but research on peer feedback in the domain of mathematics is limited. Although domain knowledge seems to be a prerequisite for peer-feedback provision, it only recently received attention in the peer-feedback literature. In this study, preservice mathematics teachers (N = 43) were involved in a peer-feedback training in which they evaluated geometric construction tasks and were (a) trained to provide peer feedback on different levels (i.e. task, process and self-regulation) and (b) scaffolded with worked examples, feedback provision prompts and evaluation rubrics during the training. A quasi-experimental mixed design was implemented with domain knowledge as the between-subject factor and measurement occasion as the within-subject factor. Students’ peer-feedback provision skills and their beliefs about peer-feedback provision were measured before and after the training. Students with high and medium domain knowledge provided more peer feedback at the self-regulation level, whereas those low in domain knowledge provided more peer feedback at the task-level after the training. Students’ beliefs about peer-feedback provision became less positive after the training, regardless of the level of their domain knowledge.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Bathke, A. C., Schabenberger, O., Tobias, R. D., & Madden, L. V. (2009). Greenhouse-Geisser adjustment and the ANOVA-type statistic: cousins...
  • Brown, G. T. L., Peterson, E. R., & Yao, E. S. (2016). Student conceptions of feedback: impact on self-regulation, self-efficacy, and...
  • Brunner, E., Munzel, U., & Puri, M. L. (1999). Rank score tests in factorial designs with repeated measures. Journal of Multivariate Analysis,...
  • Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3),...
  • Carroll, W. M. (1994). Using worked examples as an instructional support in the algebra classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3),...
  • Chen, N., Wei, C., Wua, K., & Uden, L. (2009). Effects of high level prompts and peer assessment on online learners’ reflection levels....
  • Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (1997). Having second thoughts: student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise. Studies in Higher...
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49(8), 725–747. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.49.8.725.
  • Ericsson, K. A., & Crutcher, R. J. (1991). Introspection and verbal reports on cognitive processes—two approaches to the study of thinking:...
  • Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed). Los Angeles: SAGE.
  • Friedrich, S., Konietschke, F., & Pauly, M. (2017). GFD: an R-package for the analysis of general factorial designs. Journal of Statistical...
  • Gan, M. (2011). The effects of prompts and explicit coaching on peer feedback quality (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University...
  • Gan, M. J. S., & Hattie, J. (2014). Prompting secondary students’ use of criteria, feedback specificity and feedback levels during an...
  • Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning...
  • Harris, L. R., Brown, G. T. L., & Harnett, J. (2015). Analysis of New Zealand primary and secondary student peer- and self-assessment...
  • Hattie, J. A., & Gan, M. (2011). Instruction based on feedback. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning...
  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487.
  • Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1),...
  • King, A. (2002). Structuring peer interaction to promote high-level cognitive processing. Theory Into Practice, 41(1), 33–39. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4101_6.
  • Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis and a preliminary...
  • Kuhn, D. (2015). Thinking together and alone. Educational Researcher, 44(1), 46–53. doi:10.3102/0013189X15569530.
  • Kuzniak, A., & Houdement, C. (2001). Pretty (good) didactical provocation as a tool for teacher’s training in geometry. In J. Novotná...
  • Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers...
  • Lavy, I., & Shriki, A. (2014). Engaging prospective teachers in peer assessment as both assessors and assesses: the case of geometrical...
  • Linderbaum, B. A., & Levy, P. E. (2010). The development and validation of the feedback orientation scale (FOS). Journal of Management,...
  • Miyakawa, T. (2004). Reflective symmetry in construction and proving. In M. J. Høines & A. B. Berit (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference...
  • Nathan, M. J., Koedinger, K. R., & Alibali, M. W. (2001). Expert blind spot: when content knowledge eclipses pedagogical content knowledge....
  • Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective. Assessment...
  • Noguchi, K., Gel, Y. R., Brunner, E., & Konietschke, F. (2012). nparLD: an R software package for the nonparametric analysis of longitudinal...
  • Nückles, M., Hübner, S., & Renkl, A. (2009). Enhancing self-regulated learning by writing learning protocols. Learning and Instruction,...
  • O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior...
  • Paas, F. G. W. C., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills:...
  • Panadero, E., Romero, M., & Strijbos, J. W. (2013). The impact of rubric and friendship on peer assessment: effects on construct validity,...
  • Panadero, E., Brown, G. T. L., & Strijbos, J. W. (2016). The future of student self-assessment: a review of known unknown and potential...
  • Patchan, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2015). Understanding the benefits of providing peer feedback: how students respond to peers’ texts of...
  • Phielix, C., Prins, F. J., & Krischner, P. A. (2010). Awareness of group performance in a CSCL-environment: effects of peer feedback and...
  • Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R. G., Kyza, E., Edelson, D., & Soloway, E. (2004). A scaffolding...
  • Reiss, K. M., Heinze, A., Renkl, A., & Groß, C. (2008). Reasoning and proof in geometry: effects of learning environment based on heuristic...
  • Renkl, A. (2014). Towards an instructionally-oriented theory of example-based learning. Cognitive Science, 38, 1–37. doi:10.1111/cogs.12086.
  • Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., Estrada, E., & Schellens, T. (2017). How do students perceive the educational value of peer assessment in...
  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1986). On having and using geometric knowledge. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: the case of mathematics...
  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1989). Explorations of students’ mathematical beliefs and behavior. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(4),...
  • Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Brand-Gruwel, S., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Martens, R. L. (2004). Training teachers in peer-assessment skills:...
  • Strijbos, J. W., & Müller, A. (2014). Personale faktoren im feedbackprozess. In H. Ditton & A. Müller (Eds.), Feedback und rückmeldungen:...
  • Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Prins, F. J., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2006). Content analysis: what are they talking about? Computers &...
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Essex, England: Pearson.
  • Tapan, M. S., & Arslan, C. (2009). Preservice teachers’ use of spatio-visual elements and their level of justification dealing with a...
  • Ufer, S., Heinze, A., & Reiss, K. (2008). Individual predictors of geometrical proof competence. In Figueras, O., Cortina, J.L., Alatorre,...
  • Ufer, S., Heinze, A., & Reiss, K. (2009). Mental models and the development of geometric proof competency. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou,...
  • Van Zundert, M. J., Könings, K. D., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2012a). Teaching domain-specific skills before...
  • Van Zundert, M. J., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Könings, K. D., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2012b). The differential effects of task complexity...
  • Wang, W. (2014). Students’ perceptions of rubric-referenced peer feedback on EFL writing: a longitudinal inquiry. Assessing Writing, 19, 80–96....