“Now you know what you’re doing right and wrong!” Peer feedback quality in synchronous peer assessment in secondary education

• Autores: Tijs Rotsaert, Ernesto Panadero, Tammy Schellens, Annelies Raes
• Localización: European journal of psychology of education, ISSN-e 1878-5174, ISSN 0256-2928, Vol. 33, Nº 2, 2018, págs. 255-275
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.1007/s10212-017-0329-x
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Dialnet Métricas: 4 Citas
• Resumen

  • This study explores the effects of peer assessment (PA) practice on peer feedback (PF) quality of 11th grade secondary education students (N = 36). The PA setting was synchronous: anonymous assessors gave immediate PF using mobile response technology during 10 feedback occasions. The design was quasi-experimental (experimental vs. control condition) in which students in one condition received a scaffold to filter out relevant information they received. It was expected that this filter-out scaffold would influence PF quality in subsequent tasks in which they were assessors. PF content analysis showed that offering multiple PF occasions improved PF quality: messages contained more negative verifications and informative and suggestive elaborations after the intervention. However, no effects were found of filtering out relevant information on PF quality. Moreover, students’ perceived peer feedback skills improved which was in correspondence with their actual quality improvement over time. Additionally, the perceived usefulness of the received feedback was rated high by all participants.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review...
  • Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167....
  • Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2015). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–14. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133.
  • Cheng, K.-H., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2015). Examining the role of feedback messages in undergraduate students’ writing performance...
  • De Swert, K. (2012). Calculating inter-coder reliability in media content analysis using Krippendorff’s alpha. Retrieved from http://www.polcomm.org/wp-content/uploads/ICR01022012.pdf.
  • Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: the risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. Heerlen: Open Universiteit...
  • Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83, 70–120.
  • Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks....
  • Gielen, M., & De Wever, B. (2012). Peer assessment in a Wiki: product improvement, students’ learning and perception regarding peer feedback....
  • Gielen, M., & De Wever, B. (2015). Structuring peer assessment: comparing the impact of the degree of structure on peer feedback content....
  • Harks, B., Rakoczy, K., Hattie, J., Besser, M., & Klieme, E. (2013). The effects of feedback on achievement, interest and self-evaluation:...
  • Hattie, J., & Gan, M. (2011). Instruction based on feedback. In Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 249–270). Routledge....
  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487.
  • Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2010). Peer assessment as collaborative learning: a cognitive perspective. Learning and Instruction, 20, 344–348....
  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310.
  • Lin, S. S. J., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking-styles. Journal...
  • Liu, N.-F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11, 279–290.
  • Liu, X., & Li, L. (2013). Assessment training effects on student assessment skills and task performance in a technology-facilitated peer...
  • Magaña, S., & Marzano, R. J. (2014). Using polling technologies to close feedback gaps. Educational Leadership, 82–83.
  • Narciss, S. (2008). Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merril, J. van Merriënboer, & M. P. Driscoll...
  • Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The nature of feedback: how different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional...
  • Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in...
  • Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective. Assessment...
  • Panadero, E. (2016). Is it safe? Social, interpersonal, and human effects of peer assessment: a review and future directions. In G. T. L....
  • Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: a review. Educational Research...
  • anadero, E., Romero, M., & Strijbos, J. W. (2013). The impact of a rubric and friendship on peer assessment: effects on construct validity,...
  • Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Strijbos, J. W. (2016). Scaffolding self-regulated learning through self-assessment and peer assessment:...
  • Prins, F. J., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006). Feedback for general practitioners in training: quality, styles, and preferences....
  • Prins, F. J., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Kirschner, P. A., & Strijbos, J. (2010). Formative peer assessment in a CSCL environment: a case study....
  • Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 435–448....
  • Reinholz, D. (2015a). Peer conferences in calculus: the impact of systematic training. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–17....
  • ed reflection: a design-based intervention for improving success in calculus. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics...
  • Reinholz, D. (2015c). The assessment cycle: a model for learning through peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,...
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being....
  • Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,...
  • Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Brand-Gruwel, S., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Martens, R. L. (2004). Training teachers in peer-assessment skills:...
  • Topping, K. J. (2003). In M. Segers, F. Dochy, & E. Cascallar (Eds.), Self and peer assessment in school and university: reliability,...
  • Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 20–27. doi:10.1080/00405840802577569.
  • Tsivitanidou, O. E., & Constantinou, C. P. (2016). A study of students’ heuristics and strategy patterns in web-based reciprocal peer...
  • Tsivitanidou, O. E., Zacharia, Z. C., & Hovardas, T. (2011). Investigating secondary school students’ unmediated peer assessment skills....
  • Van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & Van Merriënboer, J. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: research findings and future directions....
  • Vanderhoven, E., Raes, A., Montrieux, H., Rotsaert, T., & Schellens, T. (2015). What if pupils can assess their peers anonymously? A quasi-experimental...
  • Yu, F.-Y., & Sung, S. (2015). A mixed methods approach to the assessor’s targeting behavior during online peer assessment: effects of...