Evidence of validity based on the relation to other variable of Pictorial Vocational Interest Inventory

• Nurcahyo, Firmanto Adi ^[1] ; Valentina , Tience Debora ^[1]
  1. [1] Udayana University

     Udayana University

     Indonesia

     
• Localización: Electronic journal of research in educational psychology, ISSN-e 1696-2095, Vol. 21, Nº. 59, 2023 (Ejemplar dedicado a: 1 de abril de 2023), págs. 205-222
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.25115/ejrep.v21i59.6364
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen
  • español

    Introducción.   El análisis de la relación entre los puntajes de las pruebas y otras variables proporciona una importante fuente de evidencia para la validez. Como nuevo instrumento, se necesita evidencia de validez del Pictorial Vocational Interest Inventory (PVII) para respaldar sus propiedades psicométricas. El propósito de este estudio es obtener evidencia de la validez del Pictorial Vocational Interest Inventory (PVII) en base a las relaciones con otro instrumento que es el Vocational Interest Scale (VIS).

    Método.  Se pidió a 570 estudiantes de secundaria que completaran Pictorial Vocational Interest Inventory (PVII) y VIS. The multitrait-multimethod was conducted by correlating the score of the Pictorial Vocational Interest Inventory (PVII) with the score of Vocational Interest Scale (VIS).

    Resultados. Se encontró evidencia de validez convergente en los tipos Realista, Artístico e Investigador. Sin embargo, los resultados del estudio no mostraron evidencia de validez convergente para los tipos Social, Emprendedor y Convencional. La correlación negativa encontrada en las relaciones de tipo Realista-Social, Investigador-Emprendedor y Artístico-Convencional indica la evidencia de validez discriminante.

    Discusión y Conclusion. Las evidencias de validez obtenidas en este estudio respaldan las evidencias de validez que se han obtenido anteriormente las cuales son evidencias de validez de contenido y evidencias de validez de estructura interna del Pictorial Vocational Interest Inventory (PVII). Los ítems del Pictorial Vocational Interest Inventory (PVII) deben desarrollarse aún más para fortalecer la representación de cada tipo de interés.

  • English

    Introduction.  Analysis of the relationship between test scores and other variables provides an important source of evidence for validity. As a new instrument, evidence of validity of Pictorial Vocational Interest Inventory (PVII) is needed to support its psychometric properties. The purpose of this study is to obtain evidence of the validity of Pictorial Vocational Interest Inventory (PVII) based on relationships with other instrument which is Vocational Interest Scale (VIS).

    Method.  570 high school students were asked to complete Pictorial Vocational Interest Inventory (PVII) and Vocational Interest Scale (VIS). The multitrait-multimethod was conducted by correlating the score of the Pictorial Vocational Interest Inventory (PVII) with the score of Vocational Interest Scale (VIS).

    Results.  Evidence of convergent validity was found in the Realistic, Artistic, and Investigative interest types. However, the results of the study did not show evidence of convergent validity for Social, Enterprising, and Conventional interest types. The negative correlation found in the Realistic-Social, Investigative-Enterprising, and Artistic-Conventional interest type relationships indicates the evidence of discriminant validity.

    Discussion and Conclusion.  The evidence of validity obtained in this study supports the evidence of validity that has been obtained previously which are evidence of content validity and evidence of internal structure validity of the Pictorial Vocational Interest Inventory (PVII). The items of Pictorial Vocational Interest Inventory (PVII) need to be developed further to strengthen the representation of each type of interest.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • American Education Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), and National Council on Measurement in Education...
  • Armstrong, P. I., Allison, W., & Rounds, J. (2008). Development and initial validation of brief public domain RIASEC marker scales. Journal...
  • Artosandi, Y. S. R. (2015). The development of vocational interest instrument for career explo-ration of Junior High School students. International...
  • Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Pustaka Pelajar.
  • Boerchi, D., & Magnano, P. (2015). Iconographic Professional Interests Inventory (3IP): A new validation study. Europe’s Journal of Psychology,...
  • Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminat validation by the multi-trait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin,...
  • Cook, D. A., & Beckman, T. J. (2006). Current concepts in validity and reliability for psy-chometric instruments: Theory and application....
  • Downing, S. M. (2003). Validity: On the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Medi-cal Education, 37(9), 830–837. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01594.x
  • Enke, S. (2009). A pictorial version of the RIASEC scales of the Personal Globe Inventory. Colorado State University. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/openview/f37bbeb6045991f13da9493e96edd4aa/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
  • Ferketich, S. L., Figueredo, A. J., & Knapp, T. R. (1991). Focus on psychometrics. The multi-trait-multimethod approach to construct validity....
  • Frisbie, D. A. (2005). Measurement 101: Some fundamentals revisited. Educational Measure-ment: Issues and Practice, 24(3), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2005.00016.x
  • Furr, R. M. (2011). Scale construction and psychometrics for social and personality psycholo-gy. SAGE.
  • Geist, H. (1959). The Geist Picture Interest Inventory: General form: Male. Psychological Reports, 5(2), 413–438. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1959.5.h.413
  • Hubley, A. M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2011). Validity and the Consequences of Test Interpretation and Use. Social Indicators Research, 103(2),...
  • Kane, M. T. (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educa-tional Measurement, 50(1), 1–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12000
  • Kotrlik, J., Williams, H., & Jabor, K. (2011). Reporting and interpreting effect size in quantita-tive agricultural education research....
  • Mukaka, M. M. (2012). A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical re-search. Malawi Medical Journal, 24(3), 69–71.
  • Nurcahyo, F. A., Azwar, S., & Kartowagiran, B. (2019). Development and psychometric properties of Pictorial Vocational Interest Inventory...
  • Post, M. W. (2016). What to do with “Moderate” reliability and validity coefficients? Ar-chives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 97(7),...
  • Sullivan, G. M. (2011). A primer on the validity of assessment instruments. Journal of Gradu-ate Medical Education, 3(2), 119-120. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-11-00075.1
  • Šverko, I., Babarović, T., & Međugorac, V. (2014). Pictorial assessment of interests: Devel-opment and evaluation of Pictorial and Descriptive...
  • Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd