La sociedad de conocimiento favorece la comunicación de la ciencia, pero restringe la acción del periodismo científico

• Autores: Martin W Bauer
• Localización: Subjetividad y Procesos Cognitivos, ISSN-e 1666-244X, Vol. 18, Nº. 2, 2014 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Publicidad, propaganda y opinión pública), págs. 53-70
• Idioma: español
• Títulos paralelos:
  • The knowledge society favours science communication, but puts science journalism into the clinch
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Dialnet Métricas: 2 Citas
• Resumen
  • español

    La sociedad de conocimiento crea condiciones favorables para la comunicación de la ciencia, mientras coloca a los periodistas científicos bajo presión. Los periodistas que trabajan al ritmo de la ciencia son actores clave en la cadena de comunicación que mantiene vivo el vasto diálogo de la ciencia en la sociedad, pero su situación profesional se está tornando precaria. Los estudios recientes se centran en observaciones sistemáticas sobre las condiciones de trabajo, la ética profesional y el futuro de la ciencia del reportaje en los medios masivos. Estos estudios nos permiten evaluar tendencias y poner en perspectiva la "percepción de crisis" en la profesión. El artículo informa algunos resultados interpretados a la luz de tendencias más abarcadoras respecto de la relación ciencia-sociedad y de la necesidad de una esfera científica pública dinámica.

  • English

    The knowledge society creates favourable conditions for science communication, while science journalists come under pressure. Journalists working on the 'science beat' are key actors in the chain of communication that keeps the great conversation of science-in-society alive, but their professional situation is becoming precarious. Recent studies bring together systematic observations on the working conditions, the professional ethos and the future of science reportage in the mass media. These studies allow us to gage trends and to put into perspective a 'sense of crisis' in the profession. The paper will report some results and interpret them into the light of larger trends in the relationship between science and society and the need for a functioning public sphere of science.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Bauer, M.W. (2012). Changement de paradigm de la communication scientifique, Un public critique pour la science commercialisee?. Question...
  • Bauer, M.W. (2012). The Sciences' Media Connection: Public Communication and its Repercussions. Springer. Dordrecht. 28. 35-58
  • Bauer, M.W, Jensen, P. (2011). The mobilisation of scientists for public engagement. Public Understanding of Science. 20. 3-11
  • Bauer, M.W, Romo, Y.J.R, Massarani, L, Howard, S, Amorin, L. (2012). Science Journalists Across the World: Working conditions & practices,...
  • Bauer, M.W, Shukla, R, Allum, N. (2012). The Culture of Science: How the public relates to science across the Globe. Routledge. New York.
  • Bucchi, M. (2008). Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. Routledge. London. 57-76
  • Brumfield, G. (2009). Supplanting the old media?. Nature. 274-77
  • (9th). Economist. 59
  • Einsiedel, E, Jelsoe, Breck, T. (2001). Public at the technology table: the consensus conference in Denmark, Canada and Australia. Public...
  • Frankfurt, H.G. (2005). On bullshit. PUP. Princeton.
  • Fleck, L. (1979). Genesis and development of a scientific fact. CUP. Chicago.
  • Gauchat, G. (2012). Politicisation of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the US, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological...
  • Gregory, J. (2011). The social psychology of communication. Palgrave Macmillan. London. 300-315
  • Gregory, J, Bauer, M.W. (2003). Les Territoires de la Culture. Press Universitaire de Lyon. MontrealLyon. 41-65
  • Goepfert, W. (2007). Journalism, Science and Society: Science communication between news and public relations. Routledge. New York. 215-226
  • Hansen, A. (1994). Journalistic practices and science reporting in the British Press. Public Understanding of Science. 3. 111-134
  • Habermas, J. (2008). Communicative action and the detranscententlized use of reason. Between naturalism and religion. 24-77
  • Habermas, J. (1989). Structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Polity Press. Cambridge....
  • Hilgartner, S. (1990). The dominant view of popularisation: conceptual problems and political uses. Social Studies of Science. 20. 519-539
  • Jasanoff, S. (2003). Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. MINERVA. 41. 222-244
  • Jurdant, B. (1994). Popular science as the autobiography of science. Public Understanding of Science. 2. 365-373
  • Kirby, D.A. (2011). Lab coats in Hollywood: science, scientists and cinema. MIT Press. Cambridge^eMA MA.
  • Maldidier, P, Boltanski, L. (1970). Carriere scientifique, morale scientifique, et vulgarisation. Social Science Information. 9. 99-118
  • Maldidier, P, Boltanski, L. (1969). La vulgarization scientifique et ses agents. Library of MSHMaison des Sciences de l'Homme. Paris.
  • Manning, M. (2009). A new horizon for the news. The NY Review of Books. LVI. 31-34
  • Neidhardt, F. (1993). The public as a communication system.
  • Nelkin, D. (1987). Selling science: how the press covers science and technology. Freeman. New York.
  • (2010). Evolution of news and the internet. STIICCP. Paris.
  • Rohrbach, D. (2007). The development of the knowledge society in 10 OECD countries between 1970 and 2002. Social Science Information. 46....
  • Roedder, S, Franzen, M, Weingart, P. The sciences' media connection - public communication and its repercussions. Dordrecht. Springer....
  • Sammut, G, Bauer, M.W. (2011). The Social Psychology of Communication. Palgrave Macmillan. London. 87-106
  • Shapin, S. (2008). The scientific life: A moral history of a late modern vocation. CUP. Chicago.
  • Williams, A, Clifford, S. (2010). Mapping the field: specialist science news journalists in the UK national media. Report produced for the...
  • Weingart, P. (1998). Science and the media. Research Policy. 27. 869-879
  • Tarrow, S. (1994). Power in movement: Social movement, collective action and politics. CUP. Cambridge.
  • Zald, M.N, McCarthy, J.D. (1987). Social movements in organisational society. Transaction books. New Bruswick^eNJ NJ.