Acceso usuarios
David J. Purpura, Connor D. O'Rear, Alexa Ellis, Jessica A. R. Logan, Lauren Westerberg, Patrick Ehrman, Yemimah A. King, Mackenna Vander Tuin, Inga Nordgren, Kristen Anderson, Jimena Cosso, Erica L. Zippert, Amy R. Napoli, Caroline Byrd Hornburg, Sara A. Schmitt, Jennifer Dobbs-Oates
Children’s early understanding of mathematics provides a foundation for later success in school. Identifying ways to enhance mathematical instruction is crucial to understanding the ideal ways to promote academic success. Previous work has identified mathematical language (i.e., the words and concepts related to early mathematical development such as more, same, or similar) as a key mechanism that can be targeted to improve children’s development of early numeracy skills (e.g., counting, cardinality, and addition). Current recommendations suggest a combination of numeracy instruction and quantitative language instruction to promote numeracy skills. However, there is limited direct support of this recommendation. The goal of the proposed study is to compare the unique and combined effects of each type of instruction on children’s numeracy skills in the context of picture book reading. We randomly assigned 234 children (ages 3–5) to one of four conditions where they worked with trained project staff who read picture books targeting: (a) quantitative language only (e.g., more or less), (b) numeracy only (e.g., cardinality, addition), (c) combined [quantitative language + numeracy], or (d) nonnumerical (active control) picture books. Results revealed no significant effects of the quantitative language only or numeracy only conditions, but mixed effects of the combined condition. These findings indicate that more work is needed on how mathematical language and numeracy instruction should best be delivered to preschool children. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)
