Inventario de Problemas Interpersonales-32 (IIP-32): Propiedades psicométricas y datos normativos en una muestra clínica de Argentina

• Gómez-Penedo, Juan Martín ^[1] ; Fernández-Álvarez, Javier ^[2] ; Maristany, Mariana ^[3] ; Freiberg-Hoffmann, Agustín ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidad de Buenos Aires

     Universidad de Buenos Aires

     Argentina

     
  2. [2] Universitat Jaume I

     Universitat Jaume I

     Castellón, España

     
  3. [3] Fundación Aiglé.

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: Revista Evaluar, ISSN-e 1667-4545, Vol. 22, Nº. 2, 2022, págs. 64-75
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.35670/1667-4545.v22.n2.38688
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-32 (IIP-32): Psychometric properties and normative data in a clinical sample from Argentina
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Dialnet Métricas: 3 Citas
• Resumen
  • español

    Este estudio analiza las propiedades psicométricas del Inventario de Problemas Interpersonales-32 (IIP-32), la medida más utilizada para evaluar dificultades en las relaciones interpersonales. Una muestra de 2128 participantes completaron el IIP-32 y otras medidas de dificultades interpersonales antes de comenzar un tratamiento psicoterapéutico. Para evaluar la confiabilidad se analizaron medidas de consistencia interna y de homogeneidad de ítems. Se analizó la validez del constructo mediante un análisis factorial confirmatorio y la validez concurrente mediante correlaciones entre el IIP-32 y otras medidas de problemáticas interpersonales. Los resultados muestran excelentes niveles de consistencia interna y homogeneidad de ítems. A su vez, los resultados muestran la validez de constructo y validez de concurrente del instrumento. En síntesis, los resultados del trabajo posicionan al IIP-32 como un instrumento de confiabilidad y validez para estudiar dificultades interpersonales con importantes implicancias para la práctica clínica en Argentina.

  • English

    This study analyzes the psychometric properties of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-32 (IIP-32), the most widely used instrument to measure relational difficulties. A sample of 2128 participants completed the IIP-32 and two additional measures of interpersonal difficulties before starting a psychotherapy treatment. To evaluate reliability, we analyzed internal consistency and item homogeneity. We analyzed the construct validity of IIP-32 through a confirmatory factor analysis and the concurrent validity through correlations between the IIP-32 and other measures of interpersonal deficits. The results of the study show excellent internal consistency and homogeneity of the items in the IIP-32. Furthermore, the results show construct validity as well as concurrent validity of the instrument. In sum, the results of this paper rank the IIP-32 as a reliable and valid instrument with important clinical implications to measure interpersonal difficulties in Argentina.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Allaire, J., Xie, Y., McPherson, J., Luraschi, J., Ushey, K., Atkins, A., Wickham, H., Cheng, J., Chang, W., & Iannone, R. (2022). rmarkdown:...
  • Barkham, M., Hardy, G. E., & Startup, M. (1996). The IIP‐32: A short version of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. British Journal...
  • Berghout, C. C., Zevalkink, J., Katzko, M. W., & de Jong, J. T. (2012). Changes in symptoms and interpersonal problems during the first...
  • Casullo, M., & Pérez, M. (2008). El inventario de síntomas SCL-90-R de L. Derogatis. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Recuperado de https://www.psi.uba.ar
  • Davidov, E., Billiet, J., Meuleman, B., & Schmidt, P. (2018). Cross-Cultural Analysis: Methods and Applications (2nd ed.). Routledge....
  • Derogatis, L. (1994). SCL-90-R. Minneapolis, MN: NCS. Dominguez-Lara, S. (2018). Magnitud del efecto, una guía rápida. Educación Médica, 19(4),...
  • Faustino, B., & Vasco, A. B. (2020). Factor structure and convergent validity of the Portuguese version of the Inventory of Interpersonal...
  • Fernández-Álvarez, H., Hirsh, H., Maristany, M., & Torrente, F. (2005). Propiedades psicométricas del OQ-45.2 en la Argentina: Un estudio...
  • Freiberg-Hoffmann, A., Stover, J. B., De la Iglesia, G., & Fernández Liporace, M. (2013). Correlaciones policóricas y tetracóricas en...
  • Froh, J. J., Fives, C. J., Fuller, J. R., Jacofsky, M. D., Terjesen, M. D., & Yurkewicz, C. (2007). Interpersonal relationships and irrationality...
  • Gadermann, A. M., Guhn, M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual,...
  • Gómez-Penedo, J. M., Areas, M. A., Manubens, R., Babl, A. M., Challú, L., Juan, S., … Grosse-Holtforth, M. (2021). Propiedades psicométricas...
  • Gómez-Penedo, J. M., Babl, A., Krieger, T., Heinonen, E., & Flückiger, C. (2020). Interpersonal agency as predictor of the within-patient...
  • Gómez-Penedo, J. M., Constantino, M. J., Coyne, A. E., Westra, H. A., & Antony, M. M. (2017). Markers for context-responsiveness: Client...
  • Hammer, J. H. (2016). Percent of Uncontaminated Correlations (PUC) Calculator: A Microsoft Excel-based tool to calculate the PUC statistic....
  • Harrell Jr, F. (2021). Hmisc: Harrell miscellaneous. R package version 4.6-0. Recuperado de https://cran.r-project.org
  • Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLoS Medicine,...
  • Horowitz, L. M. (2004). Interpersonal foundations of psychopathology. American Psychological Association. Recuperado de https://www.apa.org
  • Horowitz, L. M., Alden, L. E., Wiggins, J. S., & Pincus, A. L. (2000). IIP, Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Manual. San Antonio: The...
  • Horowitz, L. M., Rosenberg, S. E., Baer, B. A., Ureño, G., & Villaseñor, V. S. (1988). Inventory of Interpersonal Problems: Psychometric...
  • Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8 [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc. Recuperado de https://ssicentral.com
  • Kiliç, A. F., & Doğan, N. (2021). Comparison of confirmatory factor analysis estimation methods on mixed-format data. International Journal...
  • Kline, R. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
  • Lambert, M. J., Burlingame, G. M., Umphress, V., Hansen, N. B., Vermeersch, D. A., Clouse, G. C., & Yanchar, S. C. (1996). Reliability...
  • Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality; a functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation. Ronald Press.
  • Li, C. H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares....
  • Lieberman, M. D. (2013). Social: Why our brains are wired to connect. OUP Oxford.
  • Lo Coco, G., Mannino, G., Salerno, L., Oieni, V., Di Fratello, C., Profita, G., & Gullo, S. (2018). The Italian version of the inventory...
  • Luo, X., Nuttall, A. K., Locke, K. D., & Hopwood, C. J. (2018). Dynamic longitudinal relations between binge eating symptoms and severity...
  • Lutz, W., Schwartz, B., Gómez-Penedo, J. M., Boyle, K., & Deisenhofer, A. K. (2020). Working towards the development and implementation...
  • Maristany, M. (2005). Problemas en las relaciones interpersonales y trastornos de la personalidad. Universidad de Belgrano. Recuperado de...
  • Maristany, M. (2008). Diagnóstico y evaluación de las relaciones interpersonales y sus perturbaciones. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica,...
  • McEvoy, P. M., Burgess, M. M., Page, A. C., Nathan, P., & Fursland, A. (2013). Interpersonal problems across anxiety, depression, and...
  • Mîndrilă, D. (2010). Maximum likelihood (ML) and diagonally weighted least squares (DWLS) estimation procedures: A comparison of estimation...
  • Newman, M. G., Jacobson, N. C., Erickson, T. M., & Fisher, A. J. (2017). Interpersonal problems predict differential response to cognitive...
  • Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions...
  • R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Recuperado de https://www.r-project.org
  • Rattray, J., & Jones, M. C. (2007). Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16(2), 234-243....
  • Reise, S. P. (2012). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(5), 667-696. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2012.715555
  • Revelle, W. R. (2017). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Northwestern University. Recuperado de https://www.scholars.northwestern.edu
  • Rial-Boubeta, A., Varela-Mallou, J., Abalo-Piñeiro, J., & Levy-Mangin, J. (2006). El análisis factorial confirmatorio. En J. P. Lévy Mangin...
  • Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures....
  • Ruiz, M. A., Pincus, A. L., Borkovec, T. D., Echemendia, R. J., Castonguay, L. G., & Ragusea, S. A. (2004). Validity of the Inventory...
  • Salazar, J., Martí, V., Soriano, S., Beltran, M., & Adam, A. (2010). Validity of the Spanish version of the Inventory of Interpersonal...
  • Salzer, S., Pincus, A. L., Winkelbach, C., Leichsenring, F., & Leibing, E. (2011). Interpersonal subtypes and change of interpersonal...
  • Schumacker, E., & Lomax, G. (2016). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modelling (4th ed.). Routledge.
  • Segrin, C. (2001). Interpersonal processes in psychological problems. Guilford Press.
  • Stiles, T., & Hoglend, P. (1994). IIP-64-C - norsk oversettelse [IIP- 64-C - Norwegian translation].
  • Sullivan, H. (1955). The interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry. London: Tavistock.
  • Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
  • Thomas, A., Brähler, E., & Strauß, B. (2011). IIP-32: Entwicklung, validierung und normierung einer kurzform des inventars zur erfassung...
  • Vanheule, S., Desmet, M., & Rosseel, Y. (2006). The factorial structure of the Dutch translation of the inventory of interpersonal problems:...
  • Von Bergen, A., & de la Parra, G. (2002). OQ-45.2, Cuestionario para evaluación de resultados y evolución en psicoterapia: Adaptación,...
  • Wampold, B. E., & Imel, Z. E. (2015). The great psychotherapy debate: The evidence for what makes psychotherapy work. Routledge.
  • Wilson, E. O. (2012). The social conquest of earth. WW Norton & Company.
  • Zilcha-Mano, S. (2021). Toward personalized psychotherapy: The importance of the trait-like/state-like distinction for understanding therapeutic...
  • Zilcha-Mano, S., Muran, J. C., Eubanks, C. F., Safran, J. D., & Winston, A. (2018). Not just a non-specific factor: Moderators of the...