Acceso usuarios
Julio Cesar Casales
This paper presents the results of a set of estudies performed in order to explane the relationships between leadership style and group productivity. For the purpose, four leadreship style dimensions were identified and measured: 1, Authoritarianism-Democratism: II, Task Centered; III, Relations Centered; IV, Tolerance Level. Group productivity was the dependent variable and also were controled as intevenient variables: technical qualification, work experience, management experience, educational level, group seniority, job and reward satisfaction and ausentism. The results obtained support the central idea of a leadership or managerial style being effective for group productivity, according to a set of circumstances that this research identified and assessed.
Artículo publicado en abril de 1995.Este reporte presenta un conjunto de estudios que se llevaron a cabo con el objeto de explicar las relaciones existentes entre el estilo de dirección y la productividad grupal. Para el efecto se identificaron y se midieron 4 dimensiones de estilo: I, Autoritarismo-Democratismo; II, Centrado en la Tarea; lll, Centrado en las Relaciones; IV, Nivel de Tolerancia. Como variable dependiente se controló la productividad y, además, se controlaron como variables intervinientes: Calificación Técnica, Experiencia de trabajo, Experiencia de Dirección, Nivel Educativo, Tiempo de Constitución del Grupo, Satisfacción con el trabajo y con el salario, ausentismo. Los resultados obtenidos apoyan Ia idea de que un estilo de mando puede o no ser efectivo para la productividad grupal, dependiendo de un conjunto de circunstancias que Ia investigación identificó y evaluó.SummaryThis paper presents the results of a set of estudies performed in order to explane the relationships between leadership style and group productivity. For the purpose, four leadreship style dimensions were identified and measured: 1, Authoritarianism-Democratism: II, Task Centered; III, Relations Centered; IV, Tolerance Level. Group productivity was the dependent variable and also were controled as intevenient variables: technical qualification, work experience, management experience, educational level, group seniority, job and reward satisfaction and ausentism. The results obtained support the central idea of a leadership or managerial style being effective for group productivity, according to a set of circumstances that this research identified and assessed.
