Acceso usuarios
Maria Eugenia Londoño Londoño, Héctor Felipe Cardona Ríos, Mónica Lorena Vargas Betancur
La literatura ha documentado ampliamente la potencialidad de daño que los factores de riesgo psicosocial laborales tienen en la vida de los trabajadores. No obstante, falta claridad en las formas de intervención y el impacto de éstas. Objetivo: Caracterizar las intervenciones de prevención primaria realizadas y publicadas sobre factores de riesgo psicosocial (FRPS) intralaboral. Metodología: Este proyecto tuvo un enfoque cuantitativo tipo revisión sistemática. Se incluyeron las publicaciones de prevención primaria, incluidas en las bases de datos EBSCO, PsycNET y SciELO, en inglés, español o portugués, entre enero de 2002 y diciembre de 2011, y que documentaran los resultados obtenidos mediante la intervención. Para la clasificación de las investigaciones publicadas, seleccionadas y analizadas se utilizó una lista de chequeo y se registró en una matriz diseñada para tal fin. En las diferentes publicaciones examinadas se identificó el enfoque de las intervenciones, la población objeto y los efectos informados por cada una. Resultados: A pesar de que 2925 artículos coincidieron inicialmente con los términos de búsqueda, luego de aplicar los filtros y revisión a partir de los criterios, únicamente ocho cumplieron las reglas de inclusión. Conclusiones: En el periodo investigado existen pocas intervenciones de FRPS intralaborales de prevención primaria. La mayoría de los artículos correlacionan las características del trabajo o los individuos con las consecuencias de los FRPS y las intervenciones se dan más a nivel secundario y sobre las condiciones de los trabajadores. Los artículos seleccionados presentan intervenciones a nivel primario en las que se ve limitada su efectividad por las dificultades para mantener los cambios propuestos en el tiempo.Resumen alternativo:The literature has extensively documented the potential damage that work's psychosocial risk factors have on the lives of workers. However, there is a lack of clarity in the forms of intervention and their impact. Objective: To characterize the primary prevention interventions conducted and published on psychosocial risk factors inside the work environment (PRF). Methodology: This project had a quantitative approach of the type systematic review. Primary prevention publications were included, found in the EBSCO, PsycNET and SciELO databases, published in English, Spanish or Portuguese between January 2002 and December 2011, which documented the results obtained by the intervention. A checklist was used for classification of the published, selected and analyzed research documents, and they were recorded in a matrix designed for this purpose. In the different publications examines the intervention focus was identified, as well as the target population and the effects reported by each one. Results: Although 2925 items initially coincided with the search terms, after applying filters and review based on the criteria, only eight met inclusion rules. Conclusions: In the period under investigation, there were a few interventions inside the work environment (PRF) of primary prevention. Most items correlate the characteristics of the work or individuals with the consequences of the PRF, and the interventions used to happen at the secondary level and on the conditions of the workers. The selected papers presented interventions at the primary level where their effectiveness is limited by the difficulties in maintaining the proposed changes over time. The literature has extensively documented the potential damage of psychosocial risk factors work on the workers' lives. However, there is a lack of clarity in the forms of intervention and their impact.
The literature has extensively documented the potential damage that work's psychosocial risk factors have on the lives of workers. However, there is a lack of clarity in the forms of intervention and their impact. Objective: To characterize the primary prevention interventions conducted and published on psychosocial risk factors inside the work environment (PRF). Methodology: This project had a quantitative approach of the type systematic review. Primary prevention publications were included, found in the EBSCO, PsycNET and SciELO databases, published in English, Spanish or Portuguese between January 2002 and December 2011, which documented the results obtained by the intervention. A checklist was used for classification of the published, selected and analyzed research documents, and they were recorded in a matrix designed for this purpose. In the different publications examines the intervention focus was identified, as well as the target population and the effects reported by each one. Results: Although 2925 items initially coincided with the search terms, after applying filters and review based on the criteria, only eight met inclusion rules. Conclusions: In the period under investigation, there were a few interventions inside the work environment (PRF) of primary prevention. Most items correlate the characteristics of the work or individuals with the consequences of the PRF, and the interventions used to happen at the secondary level and on the conditions of the workers. The selected papers presented interventions at the primary level where their effectiveness is limited by the difficulties in maintaining the proposed changes over time. The literature has extensively documented the potential damage of psychosocial risk factors work on the workers' lives. However, there is a lack of clarity in the forms of intervention and their impact.
