Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students: Comparación de las propiedades psicométricas entre las versiones de lápiz-papel y online en estudiantes universitarios

• Agustín Freiberg-Hoffmann ^[1] ; Agustín Romero-Medina ^[2]
  1. [1] Universidad de Buenos Aires

     Universidad de Buenos Aires

     Argentina

     
  2. [2] Universidad de Murcia

     Universidad de Murcia

     Murcia, España

     
• Localización: Revista iberoamericana de diagnóstico y evaluación psicológica, ISSN 1135-3848, ISSN-e 2183-6051, Vol. 4, Nº 61, 2021, págs. 165-175
• Idioma: español
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students: A comparison of psychometric properties between paper and pencil and online versions in college students
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Dialnet Métricas: 4 Citas
• Resumen
  • español

    Se analizan las propiedades psicométricas de la versión argentina del ASSIST y su invarianza factorial según modalidad de administración (lápiz-papel y online). Se trabajó con dos muestras de estudiantes universitarios de Argentina. Una de ellas (n=700) contestó el ASSIST en formato de lápiz y papel, y la otra (n=835) lo hizo de modo online. Se testeó el ajuste del modelo para ambas muestras observando adecuados índices. Luego se comparó el modelo entre los formatos de administración verificando una adecuada invarianza métrica.

    Asimismo, se analizó la consistencia interna de las dimensiones del instrumento para cada muestra y se las comparó entre ellas. Los resultados mostraron adecuados índices. Finalmente, no se observaron variaciones al comparar los puntajes de las dimensiones entre ambas muestras. Se discute el alcance de los resultados y sus implicancias prácticas.

  • English

    The psychometric properties of the Argentinian version of the ASSIST and its factorial invariance for two administration formats (paper-pencil and online), were analyzed. Two samples were employed. In one of them, the participants (n=700) completed the ASSIST in paper and pencil format, and in the other (n=835), they responded online. The model fit for both samples was tested obtaining adequate indices. A factorial invariance analysis then compared the model for the two administration formats, verifying adequate metric invariance. Furthermore, the internal consistency of the instrument dimensions for each sample was analyzed and compared. Results showed good coefficients. Finally, the comparison of dimension scores between the samples did not produce variations. The results and their practical implications are discussed.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Alhadabi, A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2019). Grit, self-efficacy, achievement orientation goals, and academic performance in university students....
  • American Psychological Association. (2000). Report of the task force on test user qualifications. Recuperado de https://www.apa.org/science/programs/testing/ qualifications.pdf
  • Bonsaksen, T. (2018). Psychometric properties of the Short ASSIST Scales. Uniped, 41(02), 164-181. doi:10.18261/issn.1893-8981-2018-02-07
  • Cai, L., & Moustaki, I. (2018). Estimation methods in latent variable models for categorical outcome variables. In P. Irwin, T. Booth...
  • Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science. Academic Press.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed). Erlbaum.
  • Çolak, E. (2015). The effect of cooperative learning on the learning approaches of students with different learning styles. Eurasian Journal...
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing. (5th ed.). HarperCollins.
  • Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., Billiet, J., & Meuleman, B. (2018). Cross-cultural analysis. Methods and applications. Routledge.
  • De la Fuente, J., Sander, P., Kauffman, D. F., & Yilmaz Soylu, M. (2020). Differential effects of self- vs. external-regulation on learning approaches,...
  • Dimitrov, D. M. (2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling...
  • Domínguez-Lara, S. (2018). Fiabilidad y alfa ordinal. Actas Urológicas Españolas, 42(2), 140-141. doi:10.1016/j.acuro.2017.07.002
  • Entwistle, N. (1991). Approaches to learning and perception of the learning environment. Higher Education, 22, 201-204. doi:10.1007/BF00132287
  • Entwistle, N., & Peterson, E. (2016). Learning styles and approaches to studying. The curated Reference collection in neuroscience and...
  • Entwistle, N., & Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments....
  • Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Tait, H. (2013). Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST). Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/503 90092_Approaches_to_learning_and_studyin g_inventory_ASSIST_3rd_edition
  • Erdogan, T., & Ozdemir, E. (2018). An investigation of learning approaches and language learning strategies: Are they related? European...
  • Freiberg-Hoffman, A., & Romero-Medina, A. (2019). Validación del Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) en universitarios...
  • Gálvez-Nieto, J. L., Salvo, S., & TrizanoHermosila, Í. (2018). Equivalencia factorial de la escala de actitudes hacia la autoridad institucional...
  • Gnambs, T., & Kaspar, K. (2015). Disclosure of sensitive behaviors across self-administered survey modes: A meta-analysis. Behavior Research...
  • Hasanpour-Dehkordi, A. (2016). The efficacy of three learning methods collaborative, contextbased learning and traditional, on learning, attitude...
  • Hyseni-Duraku, Z. (2017). Factors influencing test anxiety among university students. The European Journal of Social and Behavioural Sciences,...
  • IBM Corporation (2012). IBM SPSS Statistics (21). Recuperado de http://www01.ibm.com/software/es/analytics/spss/ International Test Commission...
  • Inzunza, B., Pérez, C., Márquez, C., Ortiz, L., Marcellini, S., & Duk, S. (2018). Estructura factorial y confiabilidad del Cuestionario...
  • Joeng, J. R., Turner, S. L., Kim, E. Y., Choi, S. A., Kim, J. K., & Lee, Y. J. (2017). Data for Korean college students׳ anxious and avoidant attachment,...
  • Karagiannopoulou, E., & Entwistle, N. (2019). Students’ learning characteristics, perceptions of small-group university teaching, and understanding...
  • Kim, J., Gabriel, U., & Gygax, P. (2019). Testing the effectiveness of the Internet-based instrument PsyToolkit: A comparison between web-based...
  • Kongsved, S. M., Basnov, M., Holm-Christensen, K., & Hjollund, N. H. (2007). Response rate and completeness of questionnaires: a randomized...
  • McDonald ,F., Reynolds, J., Bixley, A., & Spronken-Smith, R. (2017). Changes in approaches to learning over three years of University...
  • Merino, C., & Lautenschlager, G. J. (2003). Comparación estadística de la confiabilidad alfa de Cronbach: aplicaciones en la medición educacional...
  • Naglieri, J. A., Drasgow, F., Schmit, M., Handler, L., Prifitera, A., Margolis, A., & Velasquez, R. (2004). Psychological testing on the Internet:...
  • Nolte, S., & Elsworth, G. R. (2014). Factorial Invariance. Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_983
  • Ossa-Cornejo, C., & Aedo-Saravia, J. (2014). Enfoques de aprendizaje, autodeterminación y estrategias metacognitivas en estudiantes de pedagogía...
  • Rial-Boubeta, A., Varela-Mallou, J., AbaloPiñeiro, J., & Lévy-Mangin, J. P. (2006). El análisis factorial confirmatorio. In: J. P. LévyMangin...
  • Romero-Medina, A., Hidalgo-Montesinos, M., González-Javier, F., Carrillo-Verdejo, E., Pedraja, M., García-Sevilla, J., & PérezSánchez,...
  • Schumacker, R., & Lomax, R. (2016). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Routledge.
  • Simelane-Mnisi, S., & Mji, A. (2017). Establishing the reliability and validity of the ASSIST questionnaire: A South African sample perspective....
  • Tait, H., Entwistle, N. J., & McCune, V. (1998). ASSIST: A re-conceptualization of the Approaches to Studying Inventory. In C. Rust (Ed.),...
  • Van Mol, C. (2016). Improving web survey efficiency: The impact of an extra reminder and reminder content on web survey response. International...
  • Ventura-León, J. L., & Caycho-Rodríguez, T. (2017). El coeficiente Omega: Un método alternativo para la estimación de la confiabilidad....
  • Vésteinsdóttir, V., Joinson, A., Reips, U.-D., Danielsdottir, H. B., Thorarinsdottir, E. A., & Thorsdottir, F. (2018). Questions on honest responding....
  • Watkins, D. (1996). The influence of social desirability on learning process questionnaires: A neglected possibility? Contemporary Educational...
  • Zárate-Santana, Z.-J., Patino-Alonso, M.-C., Sánchez-García, A.-B., & Galindo-Villardón, P. (2021). Learning approaches and coping with...
  • Zhou, X., Chen, L. H., & Chen, C. L. (2019). Collaborative learning by teaching: A pedagogy between learner-centered and learner-driven....