Acceso usuarios
Natacha Salomé Lima
La fecundación heteróloga, producto de los procedimientos de alta complejidad reproductiva, genera muchos interrogantes. ¿Qué es lo que deben saber las personas que fueron concebidas con gametos donados? En los últimos años, las guías de buenas prácticas médicas recomiendan la revelación del origen genético, bregando por la apertura y la transmisión intrafamiliar. Constatamos sin embargo, dificultades ante la revelación. El presente trabajo indaga la noción de identidad y los caminos de la identificación, que desde el discurso psicoanalítico aporta valiosos elementos de juicio. La lectura de los artículos del Código Civil y Comercial Argentino (2015) de muestra las contradicciones y dificultades inherentes a la normativización de ciertos aspectos filiatorios. Concluimos que la identidad, en tanto noción a construir, se encuentra enraizada en tramas identificatorias, significantes, que al no agotarse en el derecho de acceder a determinada información, requiere de una tramitación singular capaz de situar la posición subjetiva en el entramado de la novela familiar.
The donation of gametes (eggs/sperm) or heterologous fertilization as a consequence of high-complexity assisted reproduction procedure has raised many questions. Should people know that they were conceived with donated gametes? What information can they access? Although the anonymity vs. non-anonymity debate of gamete donation is not new, we are witnessing a shift in which guidelines suggest disclosure and openness, but leave the final decision to the parents. While local and international professional guidelines (ASRM. Ethics Committee. Informing offspring of their conception by gamete or embryo donation: A committee opinion. American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Fertility and Sterility, 2013; Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Donor conception: ethical aspects of information sharing. London, 2013; The Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority. Code of Practice 8th edition. London, 2015) recommend disclosures of genetic information at an early age, the facts reveal that people face many troubles to disclose this information to their children. Is this going against people’s right to identity? In other words, can reproductive choices affect an individual´s identity? The following essay explores the notion of identity and its relation with the psychoanalytical term of identification (Freud-Lacan) aiming to develop a novel perspectives to address the present discussion. It provides also an examination of selected articles of the Argentine Civil and Commercial Code (2015), extracted from the Family Relations section (Arts. 401-723), trying to show the inherent contradictions and difficulties express in the regulatory domain to address the filiatory aspects.
In conclusion, it may be said that identity is a concept that need to be build considering many and diverse features. Within the technical procedures of gamete donation, complex processes of subjectivation are involved which are necessary to investigate. Personal identity is rooted in identification traits, which are not fully dependent on the right to know the donor's identifying information, but are connected to singular constitutional process, which implies the elaboration of the subjective positioning in the family novel.
