Partner phubbing scale: Evidências de validade e precisão

• Autores: Lara María Backes de Sotto Mayor, Sandra Elisa de Assis Freire
• Localización: Summa Psicológica UST, ISSN 0718-0446, Vol. 17, Nº. 1, 2020
• Idioma: portugués
• DOI: 10.18774/0719-448x.2020.17.420
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen
  • español

    El presente trabajo fue organizado en dos estudios y tuvo por objetivo adaptar y validar a Partner Phubbing Scale para la realidad brasileña. El Estudio 1 tuvo la participación de 233 personas mientras que el Estudio 2 contó con 217 personas, todas en alguna relación amorosa. En ambos estudios respondieron a Partner Phubbing Scale ya cuestiones sociodemográficas. Los resultados del Estudio 1 fueron a nivel exploratorio apuntando la unidimensionalidad del instrumento con consistencia interna de 0,96; en el Estudio 2 el análisis factorial confirmatorio apuntó para un buen ajuste del modelo unidimensional (CFI = 0,99, TLI = 0,99, y RMSEA (IC 90%) = 0,03) con confiabilidad de 0,88. Los datos sugieren que el Partner Phubbing Scale es adecuado para su uso en investigaciones futuras sobre el partner phubbing, visto su adecuación a los parámetros psicométricos investigados en dos momentos diferentes.

  • English

    The present study was organized in two studies and it aimed to adapt and validate the Partner Phubbing Scale for the Brazilian reality. Study 1 had the participation of 233 people while Study 2 had 217 people, all in some romantic relationship. In both studies they answered the Partner Phubbing Scale and sociodemographic questions. The results of Study 1 were at the exploratory level pointing to the unidimensionality of the instrument with internal consistency of 0.96; in Study 2 the confirmatory factorial analysis pointed to a good fit of the one-dimensional model (CFI = 0,99; TLI = 0,99; e RMSEA (IC 90%) = 0,03) with reliability of 0.88. The data suggest that the Partner Phubbing Scale is suitable for use in future research on the phubbing partner, given its adequacy to the psychometric parameters investigated in two different times.

  • português

    O presente trabalho foi organizado em dois estudos e teve por objetivo adaptar e buscar evidências de validade e precisão da a Escala de Phubbing para Relacionamentos Amorosos (EPRA) para o contexto brasileiro. O Estudo 1 teve a participação de 233 pessoas enquanto o Estudo 2 contou com 217 pessoas, todas em algum relacionamento amoroso. Em ambos os estudos eles responderam à EPRA e à questões sociodemográficas. Os resultados do Estudo 1 foram a nível exploratório apontando a unidimensionalidade do instrumento com consistência interna de 0,96; no Estudo 2 a análise fatorial confirmatória apontou para bom ajustamento do modelo unidimensional (CFI = 0,99; TLI = 0,99; e RMSEA (IC 90%) = 0,03) com confiabilidade de 0,88. Os dados sugerem que a EPRA é adequada para uso em pesquisas futuras sobre o partner phubbing, visto sua adequação aos parâmetros psicométricos investigados em dois momentos diferentes.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Abeele, M. M. V., Antheunis, M. L., & Schouten, A. P. (2016). The effect of mobile messaging during a conversation on impression formation...
  • Água, J., Coelho, C., Lourenço, M. G., Patrão, I., & Leal, I. Partner Phubbing (Pphubbing): Validação Portuguesa. In Actas do 8º Congresso...
  • Baglin, J. (2014). Improving Your Exploratory Factor Analysis for Ordinal Data: A Demonstration Using FACTOR. Practical Assessment, Research...
  • Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review....
  • Cha, E. S., Kim, K. H., & Erlen, J. A. (2007). Translation of scales in cross‐cultural research: issues and techniques. Journal of advanced...
  • Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2016). How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone....
  • Cizmeci, E. (2017). Disconnected, Though Satisfied: Pphubbing Behavior And Relationship Satisfaction. The Turkish Online Journal of Design,...
  • Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3),...
  • Duran, R. L., Kelly, L., & Rotaru, T. (2011). Mobile phones in romantic relationships and the dialectic of autonomy versus connection....
  • González-Rivera, J., Segura-Abreu, L., & Urbistondo-Rodríguez, V. (2018). Phubbing en las Relaciones Románticas: Uso del Celular, Satisfacción...
  • Haigh, A. (2015). Stop phubbing. Retrieved from: http://stopphubbing.com
  • Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados (6ª ed.). Porto Alegre,...
  • Halpern, D., & Katz, J. E. (2017). Texting's consequences for romantic relationships: A cross-lagged analysis highlights its risks....
  • Holgado-Tello, F., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Barbero-García, I., & Vila-Abad, E. (2010). Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory...
  • Lenhart, A., & Duggan, M. (2014). Couples, the internet, and social media. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from: https://www.pewinternet.org/2014/02/11/couples-the-internet-and-social-media/
  • McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). “Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s...
  • Miller-Ott, A. E., Kelly, L., & Duran, R. L. (2012). The effects of cell phone usage rules on satisfaction in romantic relationships....
  • Mislevy, R.J., & Bock, R.D. (1990). BILOG 3 Item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models. Mooresville: Scientific Software.
  • Misra, S., Cheng, L., Genevie, J., & Yuan, M. (2016). The iPhone effect: the quality of in-person social interactions in the presence...
  • Oulasvirta, A., Rattenbury, T., Ma, L., & Raita, E. (2012). Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing,...
  • Pasquali, L. (1999). Instrumentos psicológicos: Manual prático de elaboração. Brasília: Lab- PAM-ibapp.
  • Pasquali, L. (2003). Psicometria: teoria dos testes na psicologia e na educação. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes.
  • Pasquali, L. (2009). Psychometrics. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 43(SPE), 992-999. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62342009000500002
  • Przybylski, A. K., & Weinstein, N. (2013). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences...
  • R Core Team (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing,Vienna, Austria.
  • Rainie, L., & Zickuhr, K. (2015). Americans’ views on mobile etiquette. Pew Research Center, 26. Retrieved from: https://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/26/americans-views-on-mobile-etiquette/
  • Roberts, J. & David, M. (2016). My life becomes a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction...
  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
  • Shapiro, A., & Ten Berge, J. M. (2002). Statistical inference of minimum rank factor analysis. Psychometrika, 67, 79-94. Retrieved from:...
  • Siegel, D. J. (2010). The mindful therapist: A clinician's guide to mindsight and neural integration. New York, NY: Norton.
  • Walsh, S. P., White, K. M., & Young, R. M. (2010). Needing to connect: The effect of self and others on young people’s involvement with...
  • Wang, X., Xie, X., Wang, Y., Wang, P., & Lei, L. (2017). Partner phubbing and depression among married Chinese adults: The roles of relationship...