Traducción y adaptación de la Level of Personal Functioning Scale - Brief Form 2.0

• Christian Schetsche ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidad de Buenos Aires

     Universidad de Buenos Aires

     Argentina

     
• Localización: Ciencias Psicológicas, ISSN 1688-4094, ISSN-e 1688-4221, Año 15, Nº. 2, 2021, págs. 15-33
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.22235/cp.v15i2.2387
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Tradução e adaptação da Level of Personal Functioning Scale - Brief Form 2.0
  • Translation and adaptation of the Level of Personal Functioning Scale - Brief Form 2.0
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen
  • español

    La quinta edición del Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales (DSM-5) introdujo el concepto de niveles de funcionamiento de la personalidad, los cuales indican la gravedad del trastorno de la personalidad. En nuestro conocimiento, no existen instrumentos psicométricos concisos para la evaluación del nivel de funcionamiento de la personalidad en lengua castellana, por lo que el objetivo del presente estudio consistió en la traducción y adaptación de la Level of Personal Functioning Scale –Brief Form 2.0. La muestra (N = 361) se recogió por internet. Los resultados del análisis factorial confirmatorio mostraron que el instrumento tiene una estructura bifactorial y que puede utilizarse, además de sus dos dimensiones autofuncionamiento y funcionamiento interpersonal, una dimensión que representa el funcionamiento general. Las consistencias internas obtuvieron valores aceptables, y en el análisis de validez convergente se encontraron correlaciones significativas con todos los rasgos de la personalidad.

  • English

    The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders(DSM-5) introduced the concept of levels of personality functioning, which indicates the severity of personality disorders. In our knowledge, there are no concise psychometric instruments for assessing the level of personality functioning in Spanish, so the objective of this study was the translation and adaptation of the Level of Personal Functioning Scale - Brief Form 2.0. The sample (N = 361) was collected via internet. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis showed that the instrument has a bifactorial structure and it can be used, in addition to its two dimensions, self-functioning and interpersonal functioning, a factor that represents general functioning. Evidence of internal consistency is provided, and significant correlations were found with all personality traits.

  • português

    A quinta edição do Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais(DSM-5) introduziu o conceito de níveis de funcionamento da personalidade, que indicam a gravidade do transtorno da personalidade. Tanto quanto sabemos, não existem instrumentos psicométricos concisos para avaliar o nível de funcionamento da personalidade na língua espanhola, pelo que o objetivo deste estudo consistiu na tradução e adaptação da Level of Personal Functioning Scale –Brief Form 2.0. A amostra (N = 361) foi coletada via internet. Os resultados da análise fatorial confirmatória mostraram que o instrumento possui uma estrutura bifatorial e que pode ser utilizado, para além das suas duas dimensões, autofuncionamento e funcionamento interpessoal, com um fator que representa o funcionamento geral. As consistências internas obtiveram valores aceitáveis,ena análise da validade convergente foram encontradas correlações significativas com todos os traços de personalidade

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Allen, I. E., & Seaman, C. A. (2007). Likert scales and data analyses. Quality Progress, 40(7), 64-65.
  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic criteria from dsM-iV-tr. American Psychiatric Pub.
  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub.
  • Bach, B., & Hutsebaut, J. (2018). Level of Personality Functioning Scale–Brief Form 2.0: Utility in Capturing Personality Problems in...
  • Bender, D. S., Morey, L. C., & Skodol, A. E. (2011). Toward a Model for Assessing Level of Personality Functioning in DSM–5, Part I: A...
  • Bernstein, R. F. (1998). Reconceptualizing Personality Disorder Diagnosis in the DSM-V : The Discriminant Validity Challenge. Clinical Psychology:...
  • Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. New York: Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757421
  • Calabrese, W. R., & Simms, L. J. (2014). Prediction of daily ratings of psychosocial functioning: Can ratings of personality disorder...
  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance. Structural Equation Modeling:...
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2° Ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. Recuperado de https://www.r-project.org/
  • Costello, A., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your...
  • de la Parra, G., Undurraga, C., Crempien, C., Valdés, C., Dagnino, P., & Gómez-Barris, E. (2018). Estructura de Personalidad en Pacientes...
  • Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency...
  • Ehrenthal, J., Dinger, U., Horsch, L., Komo-Lang, M., Klinkerfuß, M., Grande, T., & Schauenburg, H. (2012). Der OPD-Strukturfragebogen...
  • Ehrenthal, J., Dinger, U., Schauenburg, H., Horsch, L., Dahlbender, R. W., & Gierk, B. (2015). Entwicklung einer Zwölf-Item-Version des...
  • Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological...
  • Fokkema, M., & Greiff, S. (2017). How Performing PCA and CFA on the Same Data Equals Trouble. European Journal of Psychological Assessment,...
  • Garland, R. (1991). The mid-point on a rating scale: Is it desirable. Marketing Bulletin, 2(1), 66-70.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7° ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.
  • Hentschel, A. G., & Livesley, W. J. (2013). The General Assessment of Personality Disorder (GAPD): Factor Structure, Incremental Validity...
  • Hinton, P., McMurray, I., & Brownlow, C. (2014). SPSS Explained (2° ed.). New York: Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315797298
  • Hofmann, R. J. (1978). Complexity And Simplicity As Objective Indices Descriptive Of Factor Solutions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 13(2),...
  • Hopwood, C. J., Good, E. W., & Morey, L. C. (2018). Validity of the DSM–5 Levels of Personality Functioning Scale–Self Report. Journal...
  • Hopwood, C. J., Malone, J. C., Ansell, E. B., Sanislow, C. A., Grilo, C. M., McGlashan, T. H., … Morey, L. C. (2011). Personality Assessment...
  • Hopwood, C. J., Schade, N., Krueger, R. F., Wright, A. G. C., & Markon, K. E. (2013). Connecting DSM-5 Personality Traits and Pathological...
  • Hopwood, C. J., Thomas, K. M., Markon, K. E., Wright, A. G. C., & Krueger, R. F. (2012). “DSM-5 personality traits and DSM–IV personality...
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives....
  • Hutsebaut, J., Feenstra, D. J., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2016). Development and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of a Brief Self-Report Questionnaire...
  • Kernberg, O. F. (2012). Overview and critique of the classification of personality disorders proposed for DSM-V. Schweizer Archiv Für Neurologie...
  • Korkmaz, S., Goksuluk, D., & Zararsiz, G. (2014). MVN: An R Package for Assessing Multivariate Normality. The R Journal, 6(2), 151-162....
  • Laireiter, A. (2013). Diagnostik in der Psychotherapie. Springer-Verlag.
  • Leising, D., & Zimmermann, J. (2011). An Integrative Conceptual Framework for Assessing Personality and Personality Pathology. Review...
  • Lenzenweger, M. F., Clarkin, J. F., Kernberg, O. F., & Foelsch, P. A. (2001). The Inventory of Personality Organization: Psychometric...
  • Leung, S.-O. (2011). A Comparison of Psychometric Properties and Normality in 4-, 5-, 6-, and 11-Point Likert Scales. Journal of Social Service...
  • Levy, K., & Clarkin, J. F. (2003). The influence of client variables on psychotherapy. En M. Lambert (Ed.), Handbook of Psychotherapy...
  • Leys, C., Klein, O., Dominicy, Y., & Ley, C. (2018). Detecting multivariate outliers: Use a robust variant of the Mahalanobis distance....
  • Livesley, W. J. (1998). Suggestions for a Framework for an Empirically Based Classification of Personality Disorder. The Canadian Journal...
  • Luyten, P., & Blatt, S. J. (2011). Integrating theory-driven and empirically-derived models of personality development and psychopathology:...
  • Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519-530. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.3.519
  • McCabe, G. A., & Widiger, T. A. (2020). A comprehensive comparison of the ICD-11 and DSM–5 section III personality disorder models. Psychological...
  • Morey, L. C., Berghuis, H., Bender, D. S., Verheul, R., Krueger, R. F., & Skodol, A. E. (2011). Toward a Model for Assessing Level of...
  • Reise, S. P., Moore, T. M., & Haviland, M. G. (2010). Bifactor Models and Rotations: Exploring the Extent to Which Multidimensional Data...
  • Revelle, W. (2019). Psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Recuperado de https://cran.r-project.org/package=psych...
  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
  • Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). A Scaled Difference Chi-Square Test Statistic for Moment Structure Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal,...
  • Simkin, H., Borchardt Dutera, L., & Azzollini, S. (2020). Evidencias de validez del Compendio Internacional de Ítems de Personalidad Abreviado....
  • Sleep, C. E., Wygant, D. B., & Miller, J. D. (2018). Examining the Incremental Utility of DSM-5 Section III Traits and Impairment in Relation...
  • Stieglitz, R.-D. (2014). Psychometrische Verfahren in der Psychotherapie. Verhaltenstherapie, 24(1), 56-65.
  • Stover, J. B., & Bruno, F. E. (2019). Estudios psicométricos del Level Of Personality Function Scale en adultos de Buenos Aires. XI Congreso...
  • Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern Applied Statistics with S. New York: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2
  • Verheul, R., Andrea, H., Berghout, C. C., Dolan, C., Busschbach, J. J. V., van der Kroft, P. J. A., … Fonagy, P. (2008). Severity Indices...
  • Weekers, L. C., Hutsebaut, J., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2019). The Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0: Update of a brief...
  • World Health Organization. (1993). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: diagnostic criteria for research (Vol. 2)....
  • Yu, C.-Y. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes. Los Ángeles:...
  • Zimmermann, J., Benecke, C., Bender, D. S., Skodol, A. E., Krueger, R. F., & Leising, D. (2013). Persönlichkeitsdiagnostik im DSM-5. Psychotherapeut,...