Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation to Chilean Youth People of Brief Resilience Scale (BRS)

• Hidalgo-Rasmussen, Carlos Alejandro ^[1] ; Chávez-Flores, Yolanda Viridiana ^[2] ; Rojas María, Jaqueline ^[3] ; Vilugrón, Fabiola ^[4]
  1. [1] Universidad de Guadalajara

     Universidad de Guadalajara

     México

     
  2. [2] Universidad Autónoma de Baja California

     Universidad Autónoma de Baja California

     México

     
  3. [3] Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, Universidad de Playa Ancha
  4. [4] Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Playa Ancha

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: Anales de psicología, ISSN-e 1695-2294, ISSN 0212-9728, Vol. 37, Nº. 2 (May - September), 2021, págs. 243-252
• Idioma: varios idiomas
• DOI: 10.6018/analesps.412931
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Adaptación transcultural y validación de la Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) para jóvenes chilenos
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen
  • español

    El estudio de la resiliencia como recuperación del estrés se ha extendido, y se requiere dar cuenta del desarrollo y las propiedades psicométricas de las escalas que permiten utilizarla. El objetivo fue adaptar transculturalmente la Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) y evaluar sus propiedades psicométricas en población joven chilena. Participaron en el año 2016, tres traductores, y 1,237 estudiantes de 18 a 24 años de una universidad de la zona Central de Chile, 60.8% mujeres y 39.2% hombres. Se consiguió la equivalencia lingüística y conceptual después de una doble traducción, retro traducción y de realizar las entrevistas cognitivas con la población diana. Se observaron dificultades en el ítem 2.  Del Análisis Factorial Exploratorio surgieron dos factores. Los índices de ajuste del Análisis Factorial Confirmatorio fueron adecuados: χ2 = 9.256(6), p = .160; CFI = .995; TLI = .988; RMSEA = .035, IC 90% [.000, .076]. El omega total .81. La estabilidad por ítem fue moderada y para la puntuación total, elevada. Las medias en general fueron menores en mujeres, pero similares entre grupos de edad. Hubo evidencia de validez concurrente y convergente. La versión chilena de la BRS puede ser útil para medir la resiliencia en jóvenes chilenos.

  • English

    The study of resilience as recovery from stress has been extended, and it is necessary to account for the development and psychometric properties of the scales that allow it to be used. The aim was to report on the cross-cultural adaptation process and psychometric properties of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) in young Chilean population. In 2016, three translators, and 1,237 students between 18 and 24 years old from a university in the Fifth Region of Chile participated. Linguistic and conceptual equivalence was achieved after carried out a double translation, back-translation and cognitive interviews with the target population. Difficulties were observed in item 2. From the Exploratory Factor Analysis, two factors emerged. In the Confirmatory Factorial Analysis, the fit indexes were suitable: χ2 = 9.256(6), p = .160; CFI = .995; TLI = .988; RMSEA = .035 CI 90% [.000, .076]. Total omega was .81. The stability per item was moderate; and high for the total score. Means were generally lower in women than in men but similar among age groups. It has evidence for concurrent and convergent validity. The BRS Chilean version might be useful for measuring resilience in young Chileans.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Amat, S., Subhan, M., Jaafar, W. M. W., Mahmud, Z., & Johari, K. S. K. (2014). Evaluation and Psychometric Status of the Brief Resilience...
  • Appelbaum, M., Cooper, H., Kline, R. B., Mayo-Wilson, E., Nezu, A. M., & Rao, S. M. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for quantitative...
  • Bauhoff, S. (2014). Self-Report Bias in Estimating Cross-Sectional and Treatment Effects. In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being...
  • Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report...
  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.107.2.238
  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. doi:...
  • Carver, C. S. (1998). Resilience and Thriving: Issues, Models, and Linkages. Journal of Social Issues, 54(2), 245–266. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.641998064
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2000). Measuring Healthy Days. Recuperado el 13 de marzo de 2017, de https://www.cdc.gov/hrqol/pdfs/mhd.pdf
  • Chen, F. F., Hayes, A., Carver, C. S., Laurenceau, J.-P., & Zhang, Z. (2012). Modeling General and Specific Variance in Multifaceted Constructs:...
  • Fleiss, J. L. (1986). The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. doi: 10.1002/9781118032923
  • Green, S. B., & Yang, Y. (2015). Evaluation of Dimensionality in the Assessment of Internal Consistency Reliability: Coefficient Alpha...
  • Hidalgo-Rasmussen, C. A., & González-Betanzos, F. (2019). El tratamiento de la Aquiescencia y la Estructura Factorial de la Escala Breve...
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives....
  • Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification...
  • Lai, J. C. L., & Yue, X. (2014). Using the Brief Resilience Scale to Assess Chinese People’s Ability to Bounce Back From Stress. SAGE...
  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. doi: 10.2307/2529310
  • Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., … de Vet, H. C. W. (2010). The COSMIN study reached...
  • Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1995). Teoría psicométrica (3ra ed.). México DF: McGraw-Hill.
  • Perry, R. P., Hall, N. C., & Ruthig, J. C. (2005). Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (J. C. Smart, Ed.). doi: 10.1007/1-4020-3279-X
  • Raykov, T. (2004). Point and Interval Estimation of Reliability for Multiple-Component Measuring Instruments via Linear Constraint Covariance...
  • Reise, S. P. (2012). The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement Models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(5), 667–696. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2012.715555
  • Rios, J., & Wells, C. (2014). Validity evidence based on internal structure. Psicothema, 26(1), 108–116. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2013.260
  • Rodríguez-Rey, R., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Hernansaiz-Garrido, H. (2016). Reliability and validity of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) Spanish...
  • Saavedra, E., & Villalta, M. (2008). Escala de resiliencia SV-RES, para jóvenes y adultos. Santiago: CEANIM.
  • Sanders, J., Munford, R., Thimasarn-Anwar, T., Liebenberg, L., & Ungar, M. (2015). The role of positive youth development practices in...
  • Saxena, S., Carlson, D., & Billington, R. (2001). The WHO quality of life assessment instrument (WHOQOL-Bref): the importance of its items...
  • Smith, B. W., Dalen, J., Wiggins, K., Tooley, E., Christopher, P., & Bernard, J. (2008). The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability...
  • Smith, B. W., Tooley, E. M., Christopher, P. J., & Kay, V. S. (2010). Resilience as the ability to bounce back from stress: A neglected...
  • Valderas, J. M., Ferrer, M., Mendívil, J., Garin, O., Rajmil, L., Herdman, M., & Alonso, J. (2008). Development of EMPRO: A Tool for the...
  • Vanderbilt-Adriance, E., & Shaw, D. S. (2008). Conceptualizing and Re-Evaluating Resilience Across Levels of Risk, Time, and Domains of...
  • Windle, G., Bennett, K. M., & Noyes, J. (2011). A methodological review of resilience measurement scales. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes,...
  • Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and Mcdonald’s ωH: their relations with each other...