Acceso usuarios
Carlos Lago Peñas, Pablo Sanromán Álvarez
El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática ha sido analizar la influencia de la posesión del balón en el rendimiento físico de los equipos y los jugadores en el fútbol masculino de elite. Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática de artículos relevantes en inglés en una base de datos (Web of Science Core Collection) y un motor de búsqueda (PubMed) siguendo el protocolo de PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses). Las palabras clave “association football” y “soccer” se relacionaron con los términos: “possession of the ball”, “possession” “physical activity” y “physical performance”. Se buscaron estudios empíricos relacionados con el rendimiento físico y la posesión del balón para su inclusión y análisis. Se revisó el texto completo de 21 estudios. Globalmente, tener un alto (51–66%) o bajo (34–50%) porcentaje de posesión del balón produce diferencias muy poco relevantes en las distancias recorridas por los jugadores. Tan sólo la distancia cubierta con y sin la posesión del balón es significativamente diferente. Además, no está claro que correr más o menos pueda asociarse con un incremento de las probabilidades de ganar o perder.
The aim of this systematic review was to provide a summary of empirical research on collective tactical behaviours in football, with a particular focus on organising the methods used and their key fndings. A systematic search of relevant English-language articles was performed on one database (Web of Science Core Collection) and one search engine (PubMed), based on PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. The keywords ‘football’ and ‘soccer’ were each paired with all possible combinations of the following keywords: “possession of the ball”, “possession” “physical activity” and “physical performance”. Empirical studies that were related to physcial performance and possession of the ball were sought for inclusion and analysis. Full-text articles of 2a studies were reviewed. Globally, having either a high (51–66%) or low (34–50%) percentage of ball possession results in trivial differences in match-running. There were significant difference in the distance covered by players distance covered by players when the team is in possession compared to out of possession. There is not a clear association between success and the distance covered by players.
