Escalas de Actividades y Ocupaciones de Dominio Público de indicadores del RIASEC para intereses y autoeficacia (AFPD): Versión en español

• Marcos Cupani ^[1] ; Valeria Estefanía Morán ^[1] ; Ana Estefanía Azpilicueta ^[1] ; Florencia Artuso ^[1] ; Natalia Vanina Piccolo ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidad Nacional de Córdoba

     Universidad Nacional de Córdoba

     Argentina

     
• Localización: Electronic journal of research in educational psychology, ISSN-e 1696-2095, Vol. 17, Nº. 48, 2019, págs. 359-382
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.25115/ejrep.v17i48.2136
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Alternate Forms Public Domain RIASEC Markers for Interests and Self-Efficacy: Spanish version
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen
  • español

    Introducción: Las Escalas de Actividades y Ocupaciones de Dominio Público de indicadores del RIASEC (AFPD) son herramientas que desde su creación han sido ampliamente utilizadas en diversas culturas para el estudio de la personalidad y los intereses, fundamentalmente en el ámbito académico. El objetivo principal del presente estudio fue desarrollar la versión en es- pañol de AFPD RIASEC y analizar sus propiedades psicométricas en muestra argentina.

    Método: La muestra estuvo compuesta por 1107 universitarios (61.6% mujeres y 38% hom- bres), con edades comprendidas entre 18 y 62 años. Se realizó la traducción de los ítems, es- tudios de estructura interna, validez convergente y consistencia interna.

    Resultados: Los resultados sugieren que la versión en español de la AFPD tiene una estructu- ra adecuada y puede utilizarse para evaluar con precisión los seis tipos de personalidad bási- cos propuestos por Holland. Verificamos las mismas propiedades psicométricas de los marca- dores de los ítems ocupacionales y de actividad para medir el interés y la autoeficacia.

    Discusión: Los resultados fueron alentadores, lo que indica que este instrumento podría con- siderarse una opción aceptable para para medir los intereses profesionales y la autoeficacia en los estudiantes universitarios argentinos, considerándose una herramienta auxiliar en la orien- tación vocacional.

  • English

    Introduction: The Alternate Forms Public Domain (AFPD) RIASEC markers are tools that since its creation have been widely used in various cultures for the study of personality and interests, mainly in the academic field. The main purpose of the present study was to develop a Spanish version of the AFPD RIASEC and analyze their psychometric properties in Argen- tinean samples.

    Method: The sample was 1107 university students (61.6% female and 38% male), aged be- tween 18 to 62 years old. The translation of the items, studies of internal structure, convergent validity and internal consistency were carried out.

    Results: The results suggested that the Spanish version of the AFPD has an adequate internal structure and can be used to accurately assess the six basic personality types that were pro- posed by Holland. We verified the same psychometric properties of the markers for occupa- tional and activity items to measure interest and self-efficacy.

    Discussion: Overall, the results were encouraging, indicating that this instrument can be con- sidered an acceptable option for Argentinean college students to measure professional inter- ests and self-efficacy as an auxiliary tool for career counseling

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Açıkgöz, Y., & Toker, Y. (2018). Integrating Occupational Complexity Levels to Interest Assessments in Social and Enterprising Areas....
  • Armstrong, P. I. & Vogel, D. L. (2010). Interpreting the interest-efficacy association from a RIASEC perspective. Journal of Counseling...
  • Armstrong, P. I., Allison, W., & Rounds, J. (2008). Development and initial validation of brief public domain RIASEC marker scales. Journal...
  • Atli, A. (2017). High School Students' Gender Role Perceptions Regarding Various Professions. International Journal of Progressive Education,...
  • Bandura, A. (1987). Pensamiento y acción: Fundamentos sociales. Barcelona: Martínez Roca.
  • Callahan, M. N. (2017). The Positive and Negative Valence of Gender in Traditional and Non-Traditional Career Choices (Doctoral dissertation,...
  • Chan, K. Y., Ho, M. R. Chernyshenko, O. S., Bedford, O., Uy, M. A., Gomulya, D., Sam, Y. L., & Phan, W. M. J. (2012). Entrepreneurship,...
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Cupani, M. & Pautassi, R. M. (2013). Predictive contribution of personality traits in a sociocognitive model of academic performance in...
  • Cupani, M., & Perez, E. (2014). Escala de actividades de domino público de indicadores del modelo de RIASEC: Estudios preliminares de...
  • De Bruin, G. P. (2004). Problems with the factor analysis of items: solutions based on item response theory and item parcelling. Journal of...
  • Flora, D. B. & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with...
  • Ghaleb, A. B., Ghaith, S., & Akour, M. (2015). Self-efficacy, achievement goals, and metacognition as predicators of academic motivation....
  • Holland, J. (1997). Making vocational choices: a theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd edition). Odessa, FL: Psychological...
  • Holland, J. L. (1985). Vocational preference inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press.
  • Holland, J. L., Fritzsche, B. A., & Powell, A. B. (1997). The Self-directed Search (SDS): Technical Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological...
  • Holtrop, D., Born, M. P., & de Vries, R. E. (2015). Relating the spherical representation of vocational interests to the HEXACO personality...
  • Hurtado Rúa, S. M., Stead, G. B., & Poklar, A. E. (2018). Five-Factor Personality Traits and RIASEC Interest Types. Journal of Career...
  • Iliescu, D., Popa, M., & Dimache, R. (2016). Adaptarea românească a Setului Internațional de Itemi de Personalitate: IPIP-Ro. Psihologia...
  • International Test Commission (2010). International Test Commission guidelines for translating and adapting tests. Retrieved from http://www.intestcom.org...
  • Jansen, M., Scherer, R., & Schroeders, U. (2015). Students' self-concept and self-efficacy in the sciences: Differential relations...
  • Kline, P. (2015). A handbook of test construction (psychology revivals): introduction to psychometric design. London: Routledge.
  • Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: a meta-analysis of person–job,...
  • Lee, B., Lawson, K. M., & McHale, S. M. (2015). Longitudinal associations between gender-typed skills and interests and their links to...
  • Lewis, P. & Rivkin, D. (1999). Development of the O-NET interest profiler. Raleigh, NC: National Center for O-NET Development.
  • Liao, H. Y., Armstrong, P. I., & Rounds, J. (2008). Development and initial validation of public domain Basic Interest Markers. Journal...
  • Ludwikowski, W. M. A., Armstrong, P. I., & Lannin, D. G. (2017). Explaining Gender Differences in Interests. Journal of Career Assessment,...
  • Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Nye, C. D., Butt, S. M., Bradburn, J., & Prasad, J. (2018). Interests as predictors of performance: An omitted and underappreciated variable....
  • Phan, W. M. J. (2015). More than feeling interested: examining the interplay between trait interest and emotions (Doctoral dissertation)....
  • Perera, H. N., & McIlveen, P. (2018). Vocational interest profiles: Profile replicability and relations with the STEM major choice and...
  • Peterson, N. G., Mumbord, M. D., Borman, W. C., Jeanneret, P. R., & Fleishman, E. A. (1999). An occupational information system for the...
  • Psychological Association.
  • Rounds, J. & Tracey, T. J. (1996). Cross-cultural structural equivalence of RIASEC models and measures. Journal of Counseling Psychology,...
  • Rust, J., & Golombok, S. (2014). Modern psychometrics: The science of psychological assessment. London: Routledge.
  • Shrive, F. M., Stuart, H., Quan, H., & Ghali, W. A. (2006). Dealing with missing data in a multi-question depression scale: a comparison...
  • Su, R., Rounds, J., & Armstrong, P. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: a meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological...
  • Walsh, W. B., Savickas, M. L., & Hartung, P. J. (2013). Handbook of vocational psychology: theory, research, and practice. New York: Routledge.
  • Yu, C. Y. & Muthen, B. (2002). Evaluation of model fit indices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes. American...
  • Zhang, Y., Kube, E., Wang, Y., & Tracey, T. J. G. (2013). Vocational interests in China: an evaluation of the Personal Globe Inventory-Short....