Psychometric properties of the french version of the young schema questionnaire - short form 3 (ysq–s3)

• Martine Bouvard ^[1] ; Anne Denis ^[3] ; Jean Luc Roulin ^[2]
  1. [1] University of Savoy

     University of Savoy

     Arrondissement de Chambéry, Francia

     
  2. [2] Laboratoire de Psychologie et NeuroCognition

     Laboratoire de Psychologie et NeuroCognition

     Arrondissement de Grenoble, Francia

     
  3. [3] Laboratoire InterUniversitaire de Psychologie (France)

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: The Spanish Journal of Psychology, ISSN 1138-7416, Nº 21, 2018, págs. 1-14
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.1017/sjp.2018.66
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • The purpose was to assess the psychometric properties of the French version of the Young Schema Questionnaire - Short Form 3 (YSQ–S3). The main non-clinical sample (N = 605, M = 20.63, 78% women) was divided into two subsamples: One was used for exploratory factor analyses (EFA) and the other was used for confirmatory analyses. Next, internal consistency, convergent validity and criterion-related validity were studied. The EFA to each of the five domains was similar to the theoretical structure postulated by Young. The confirmatory analysis of each of the five domains appeared to favor our solution over a single-factor solution and Young’s solution. The confirmatory factor analyses of high-order structures did not give fully satisfactory results but appeared to favor our solution (RMSEA =.11, CFI =.76, TLI =.71, SRMR =.07, AIC = 58,566.44). In our best model, the reliability (> .70) was satisfactory for fourteen schemas. The relationships between the schemas and the neuroticism, extraversion and psychoticism scores went in the expected directions. Detrimental parental rearing behaviors were linked to high scores for the various schemas. Lastly, 4 schemas differentiated between the clinical and non-clinical groups. In conclusion, the overall psychometric qualities of the French version of the YSQ–S3 allow its use in clinical populations.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Arrindell, W. A., Akkerman, A., Bagès, N., Feldman, L., Caballo, V. E., Oei, T. P. S., & Zaldívar, F. (2005). The short-EMBU in Australia,...
  • Arrindell, W. A., & Engebretsen, A. A. (2000). Convergent validity of the short-EMBU and the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI): Dutch...
  • Arrindell, W. A., Sanavio, E., Aguilar, G., Sica, C., Hatzichristou, C., Eisemann, M., … & van der Ende, J. (1999). The development of...
  • Bach, B., Simonsen, E., Christoffersen, P., & Kriston, L. (2017). The Young Schema Questionnaire 3 Short Form (YSQ–3). Psychometric properties...
  • Bouvard, M., Aulard, J., Longuepée, L., Rogé, B., & Hautekeete, M. (2010). Etude préliminaire de la version abrégée du questionnaire sur...
  • Bouvard, M., Aulard-Jaccod, J., Pessonneaux, S., Hautekeete, M., & Rogé, B. (2010). Etude du questionnaire de personnalité d’Eysenck révisé...
  • Calvete, E., Orue, I., & Gonzalez-Diez, Z. (2013). An examination of the structure and stability of early maladaptive schemas by means...
  • Cattell, R. B. (1966). The Scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
  • Eysenck, S. B. G., Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985). A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences,...
  • Eysenck, H. J. (1992). The definition and measurement of psychoticism. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 757–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90050-y
  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Hawke, L. D., & Provencher, M. D. (2012). The Canadian French Young Schema Questionnaire: Confirmatory factor analysis and validation...
  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modeling guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal...
  • Kriston, L., Schäfer, J., Jacob, G. A., Härter, M., & Hölzel, L. P. (2013). Reliability and validity of the German version of the Young...
  • Lewis, C. A., Francis, L. J., Shevlin, N., & Forrest, S. (2002). Confirmatory factor analysis of the French translation of the abbreviated...
  • Muris, P. (2006). Maladaptive schemas in non-clinical adolescents: Relations to perceived parental rearing behaviors, Big Five Personality...
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th Ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  • Rafaeli, E., Bernstein, D. P., & Young, J. (2011). Schema therapy . London, UK: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Saritas, D., & Gençöz, T. (2011). Psychometric properties of “Young Schema Questionnaire-short form 3” in a Turkish adolescent sample....
  • Soygut, G., Karaosmanoglu, A., & Çakir, Z. (2009). Assessment of early maladaptive schemas: A psychometric study of the Turkish Young...
  • Young, J. E. (1994). Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema-focused approach (2nd ed). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource...
  • Young, J. E. (2005). Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form 3 (YSQ–S3). New York, NY: Cognitive Therapy Center.
  • Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., & Weishaar, M. E. (2003). Schema therapy. A practitioner’s guide. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Yu, C. Y. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes (unpublished...