Estudio psicométrico y validación de un cuestionario para la evaluación del profesorado universitario de enseñanza a distancia

• Cañadas, Isabel ^[1] ; de la Cuétara, Isabel ^[2]
  1. [1] Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche

     Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche

     Elche, España

     
  2. [2] Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

     Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

     Madrid, España

     
• Localización: Revista de estudios e investigación en psicología y educación, ISSN-e 2386-7418, Vol. 5, Nº. 2, 2018, págs. 102-112
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.17979/reipe.2018.5.2.3701
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Psychometric study and validation of a questionnaire for the evaluation of online university lecturers
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Dialnet Métricas: 4 Citas
• Resumen
  • español

    En este trabajo se presenta el estudio psicométrico del Cuestionario de Evaluación del Profesorado Universitario versión a Distancia (CEPU, versión D), cuya finalidad es evaluar la docencia de los profesores que ejercen su trabajo en la modalidad no presencial, sobre la base de las consideraciones previas del estudiante. El cuestionario ha sido construido utilizando una combinación de metodología cualitativa y cuantitativa. La novedad más relevante de esta escala es que se ha creado a partir de la opinión de los estudiantes sobre las cualidades que debe tener un profesor a distancia (online) para ser considerado un buen profesor. En anteriores trabajos hemos presentado el procedimiento empleado para construir la escala; en este trabajo presentamos el estudio psicométrico del cuestionario específico para tutores a distancia. La muestra se seleccionó mediante muestreo aleatorio por conglomerados, considerando como conglomerado el Campus. Se llevó a cabo un análisis factorial exploratorio (AFE) y a continuación un análisis factorial confirmatorio (AFC). Los resultados indican que el cuestionario tiene una alta fiabilidad y validez, lo que lo convierte en una herramienta de evaluación útil y relevante.

  • English

    In this paper we present the psychometric study of the Questionnaire for the Evaluation of Online University Lecturers (version D), whose purpose is to evaluate the teaching of professors who work online mode, on the basis of the previous considerations of the student. The questionnaire has been constructed using a combination of qualitative and quantitative methodology. The particularly relevant feature of this scale is that it has been generated from the students' opinion about the characteristics that online lecturers must have in order to be considered a good teacher. In previous works we have presented the procedure that has been used to build the scale; in this we present the psychometric study of the specific questionnaire for online tutors. The sample was selected by random sampling by conglomerates, considering the Campus as a conglomerate. An exploratory factorial analysis (AFE) was carried out and subsequently a confirmatory factorial analysis (CFA). The results indicate that the constructed questionnaire has a high reliability and validity, which makes it a useful and relevant evaluation tool. 

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological...
  • Apodaca, P., & Grad, H. (2005). The dimensionality of student ratings of teaching: integration of uni- and multidimensional mols. Studies...
  • Barth, M.M. (2008). Deciphering student evaluations of teaching: A factor analysis approach. Journal of Education for Business, 84, 40–46....
  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
  • Brown, T., Williams, B., Jaberzadeh, S., Roller, L., Palermo, C., McKenna, L. … Sim, J. (2010). Predictors of attitudes to e-learning of Australian...
  • Buchanan, J. (2011). Quality teaching: means for its enhancement? Australian Universities’ Review, 53(1), 66–72. Recuperado de https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ926451
  • Burdsal, C. A., & Harrison, P. D. (2008). Further evidence supporting the validity of both a multidimensional profile and an overall evaluation...
  • Cañadas, I. (2013). Study of the qualities of a good university lecturer of health sciences. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 89,...
  • Cañadas, I., Cuétara, I., & San Luis, C. (2014). Qualities demanded by on-line universties students about their tutors. International...
  • Casero, A. (2010). Factores moduladores de la percepción de la calidad docente. RELIEVE, 16(2), 1-17. Recuperado de http://www.uv.es/RELIEVE/v16n2/RELIEVEv16n2_3.htm
  • Carrascosa, J.R. y Molero, D. (2005). La valoración de la docencia universitaria en función del sexo y del centro de los estudiantes encuestados....
  • De Juan, J, Pérez, R.M, Gómez-Torres, M.J., Vizcaya, M.F. y Mora, J.M. (2007). Buenas prácticas en la evaluación de la docencia y del profesorado...
  • Ferguson, J.M., & De Felice, A.F. (2010). Length of online course and student satisfaction, perceived learning, and academic performance....
  • Ferrando, P. J. y Anguiano-Carrasco, C. (2010). El análisis factorial como técnica de investigación en psicología. Papeles del Psicológo,...
  • Fu, F.L. (2010). Comparison of students’ satisfaction and dissatisfaction factors in different classroom types in higher education. En Tsang...
  • Harman, H.H. (1976) Modern factor analysis. Third edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrica, 30(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447
  • Hung, M.L., & Chou, Ch. (2014). Students’ perceptions of instructors’ roles in blended and online learning environments: A comparative...
  • Hu, L. & Bentler, P. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modelling: Concepts, issues and applications...
  • Kuo, Y.C., Walker, A.E., Belland, B.R., & Schroder, K.E.E., (2013). A predictive study of satisfaction in online education programs. The...
  • Lattin, J. M., Carroll, J. D., Green, P. E., & Green, P. E. (2003). Analyzing multivariate data. Pacific Grove, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole.
  • Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2013). FACTOR 9.2: A Comprehensive program for fitting exploratory and semiconfirmatory factor analysis...
  • MacDonald, K., & Gobson, C.E. (2011) Your tutor is your friend: using experiential learning to enhance second year transition. Journal...
  • Martínez Arias, R. (1995). Psicometría: Teoría de los tests psicológicos y educativos. Madrid: Síntesis.
  • Marsh, H.W. (2007). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases and usefulness....
  • Mortelmans, D., & Spooren, P. (2009). A revalidation of the SET37-questionnaire for student evaluations of teaching. Educational Studies,...
  • Muthén, B., & Kaplan D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables: A note on the...
  • Naaj, M., Nachouki, M., & Ankit, A. (2012). Evaluating student satisfaction with blended learning in a gender-segregated environment....
  • Okoro, C.O., & Chukwudi, E.K. (2011). The ideal teacher and the motivated student in a changing environment. Journal of Educational and...
  • Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Daniel, L.G., & Collins, K.M.T. (2009). A metavalidation model for assessing the score validity of student teaching...
  • Pan, D., Tan, G.S.H., Ragupathi, K., Booluck, K., Roop, R., & Ip,Y.K. (2009). Profiling teacher/teaching using descriptors derived from...
  • Pozo-Munoz, C., Rebolloso-Pacheco, E., & Fernandez-Ramirez, B. (2000). The 'Ideal Teacher'. Implications for student evaluation...
  • Rogers, J., & Smith, M. (2011). Demonstrating genuine interest in students' needs and progress: Implications for student satisfaction...
  • Rothman, T., Romeo, L., Brennan, M., & Mitchell, D. (2011). Criteria for assessing student satisfaction with online courses. International...
  • San Luis, C., & Cañadas, I. (2014). Qualitative and quantitative methods to assess the qualities of a lecturer: What qualities are demanded...
  • Schmid, J., & Leiman, J. M. (1957). The development of hierarchical factor solutions. Psychometrika, 22, 53-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02289209
  • Snook, S. C., & Gorsuch, R. L. (1989). Component analysis versus common factor analysis: A Monte Carlo study. Psychological Bulletin,...
  • Spencer, K. J. and Schmelkin, L. P. (2002). Student perspectives on teaching and its evaluation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,...
  • Spooren, P., Brockx, B., & Mortelmans, D. (2013). On the validity of student evaluation of teaching: The State of the Art. Review of Educational...
  • Su, F., & Wood, M. (2012). What makes a good university lecturer? Students’ perceptions of teaching excellence Journal of Applied Research...
  • Tanaka, J.S., & Huba, G.J. (1985). A fit index for covariance structure models under arbitrary GLS estimation. British Journal of Mathematical...
  • Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological...