Hans Jonas on teleology in biology.: The relevance of existential philosophy for biological thinking

• Trnka, Jan ^[1]
  1. [1] Charles University in Prague

     Charles University in Prague

     Chequia

     
• Localización: Límite: revista de filosofía y psicología, ISSN-e 0718-5065, ISSN 0718-1361, Vol. 10, Nº. 34, 2015, págs. 41-49
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen

  • Teleological concepts are considered suspect in modern biology but they seem to be difficult to uproot without losing important biological categories such as “function” or “adaptation”. This paper briefly reviews the various philosophical approaches to re-defining teleological concepts using causal theories and then discusses a very different approach to the philosophy of life, namely Hans Jonas’s existential philosophy. In his major work “The Phenomenon of Life” Jonas attempts to find a solution to the disparity between the human experience of life and the materialist assumptions of modern science. Using a range of historical, ontological and epistemological arguments he shows the inadequacy of the materialist stance and instead suggests a possibility for a co-existence of the causal and teleological approaches as they both stem from our human experience.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Amundson, R. & Lauder, G. (1994). Function without purpose. Biology and Philosophy, 9, 443-469.
  • Ariew, A. (2002). Platonic and Aristotelian roots of teleological arguments. In André Ariew, Robert Cummins, and Mark Perlman (Eds.), Functions...
  • Bock, W. & Wahlert, G. (1965). Adaptation and the form-function complex. Evolution, 19(3), 269-299.
  • Boorse, C. (2002). A rebuttal on functions. In André Ariew, Robert Cummins, and Mark Perlman (Eds.), Functions (pp. 63-112). U. K.: Oxford...
  • Cummins, R. (1975). Functional analysis. The Journal of Philosophy, 72(20),741-765.
  • Descartes, R. (1968). Discourse on method and the meditations. U. K.: Penguin Books.
  • Jonas, H. (1966). The Phenomenon of Life. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Millikan, R. (1989). In defense of proper functions. Philosophy of Science, 56(2), 288-302.
  • Nagel, E. (1977). Functional explanations in biology. The Journal of Philosophy, 74(5), 280-301.
  • Nagel, E. (1977b). Goal-directed processes in biology. The Journal of Philosophy, 74(5), 261-279.
  • Neander, K. (1991). Functions as selected effects: The conceptual analyst’s defense. Philosophy of Science, 58(2), 168-184.
  • Plato. (1997). Complete works. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
  • Ruse, M. (2002). Evolutionary biology and teleological thinking. In André Ariew, Robert Cummins, and Mark Perlman (Eds.), Functions (pp. 33-59)....
  • Wright, L. (1973). Functions. The Philosophical Review, 82(2), 139-168.