¡Lo han vuelto a hacer! Respuestas de control social a la incidencia repetida de la desviación en grupos pequeños

• Daniel Frings ^[1] ; Isabel R. Pinto ^[2]
  1. [1] London South Bank University

     London South Bank University

     Reino Unido

     
  2. [2] Universidade Do Porto

     Universidade Do Porto

     Santo Ildefonso, Portugal

     
• Localización: International Journal of Social Psychology, Revista de Psicología Social, ISSN-e 1579-3680, ISSN 0213-4748, Vol. 33, Nº 3, 2018, págs. 578-619
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.1080/02134748.2018.1482055
• Títulos paralelos:
  • They did it again! Social control responses to repeated incidences of deviance in small groups
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen
  • español

    Los miembros del grupo que tienen un comportamiento desviado e infringen las normas suelen desafiar la validez social y la movilidad del grupo, provocando distintos tipos de respuesta de control social. En este estudio (N = 95) se exploraron los cambios ocurridos en el tiempo en el uso de cuatro respuestas de control social de distinta severidad (persuasión, humillación, exclusión temporal y exclusión permanente) que surgen como reacción al comportamiento desviado. También se comprobó el papel que ejerce la eficacia percibida de las diversas respuestas en la selección, así como el apoyo social que estas suscitan. Los resultados muestran que el grado de gravedad de la respuesta de control social seleccionada está relacionado con preocupaciones pragmáticas y de identidad: con el tiempo, las respuestas son más severas, motivadas principalmente por su eficacia y el apoyo social percibidos.

  • English

    Deviant group members who break group norms often challenge social validity and group locomotion, invoking varying types of social control responses. The current study (N = 95) investigated changes over time in the use of four social control responses of varying severity (persuasion, embarrassment, temporary exclusion and permanent exclusion) employed in response to deviance. It also tested the roles that perceived effectiveness of and social support for various responses play in response selection. Findings show severity of social control response selection is driven by both pragmatic and identity-based concerns: Over time, responses become more severe, driven in part by effectiveness and social support.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Abrams, D., Bown, N., Marques, J. M., & Henson, M. (2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups. Journal of Personality...
  • Abrams, D., Frings, D. J., & Randsley de Moura, G. R. (2005). Group identity and self-definition. Handbook of Group Research and Practice,...
  • Abrams, D., Marques, J. M., Randsley de Moura, G., Hutchison, P., & Bown, N. J. (2004). The maintenance of entitativity: A subjective...
  • Abrams, D., Rutland, A., Cameron, L., & Marques, J. M. (2003). The development of subjective group dynamics: When in-group bias gets specific....
  • Asch, S. E. (1952). Group forces in the modification and distortion of judgments. Social Psychology, , 450-501.
  • Bègue, L. (2001). Social judgment of abortion: A black-sheep effect in a catholic sheepfold. Journal of Social Psychology, 141(5), 640-649....
  • Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame and Reintegration,
  • Branscombe, N. R., Wann, D. L., Noel, J. G., & Coleman, J. (1993). In-group or out-group extremity: Importance of the threatened social...
  • Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce...
  • Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal...
  • Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004). Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(2), 63-87. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(04)00005-4
  • Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U., & Gächter, S. (2002). Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms. Human Nature,...
  • Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57(5), 271-282. doi:10.1037/h0056932
  • Festinger, L., Gerard, H. B., Hymovitch, B., Kelley, H. H., & Raven, B. (1952). The influence process in the presence of extreme deviates....
  • Festinger, L., & Thibaut, J. (1951). Interpersonal communication in small groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46(1), 92-99....
  • Forsyth, D. R. (1990). Group Dynamics,
  • Frings, D., & Abrams, D. (2010). The effect of difference oriented communication on the subjective validity of an in-group norm: DOC can...
  • Frings, D., Abrams, D., De Moura, G. R., & Marques, J. (2010). The effects of cost, normative support, and issue importance on motivation...
  • Frings, D., Hurst, J., Cleveland, C., Blascovich, J., & Abrams, D. (2012). Challenge, threat, and subjective group dynamics: Reactions...
  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). An Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach,
  • Horne, C., & Cutlip, A. (2002). Sanctioning costs and norm enforcement: An experimental test. Rationality and Society, 14(3), 285-307....
  • Israel, J. (1956). Self-Evaluation and Rejection in Groups,
  • Jacobs, D., & Kent, S. L. (2007). The determinants of executions since 1951: How politics, protests, public opinion, and social divisions...
  • Jetten, J., Hogg, M. A., & Mullin, B. A. (2000). In-group variability and motivation to reduce subjective uncertainty. Group Dynamics,...
  • Jetten, J., & Hornsey, M. J. (2011). Rebels in Groups: Dissent, Deviance, Difference and Defiance,
  • Jetten, J., & Hornsey, M. J. (2014). Deviance and dissent in groups doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115151
  • Jiménez-Moya, G., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., Spears, R., & de Lemus, S. (2017). Collective resistance despite complicity: High identifiers...
  • Jones, E. E., & Gerard, H. B. (1967). Foundations of Social Psychology,
  • Kerr, N. L. (1992). Efficacy as a causal and moderating variable in social dilemmas. Social Dilemmas: Theoretical Issues and Research Findings,...
  • Kurzban, R., & Leary, M. R. (2001). Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion. Psychological Bulletin,...
  • Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36(4), 343-356. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.36.4.343
  • Leach, C. W., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L. W., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., . . . Spears, R. (2008). Group-level self-definition...
  • Lee, S. -., & Tedeschi, J. T. (1996). Effects of norms and norm-violations on inhibition and instigation of aggression. Aggressive Behavior,...
  • Levine, J. M., & Kerr, N. L. (2007). Inclusion and exclusion: Implications for group processes. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles.2nd...
  • Levine, J. M., Moreland, R. L., & Hausmann, L. R. M. (2004). Managing group composition: Inclusive and exclusive role transitions. Social...
  • Marques, J. M., Abrams, D., & Serôdio, R. G. (2001). Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group...
  • Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Leyens, J. ‐. (1988). The “Black sheep effect”: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a...
  • Moreland, R., Levine, J., & Cini, M. (1993). Group socialization: The role of commitment. Group Motivation: Social Psychological Perspectives,...
  • Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1988). Group dynamics over time: Development and socialization in small groups. The Social Psychology...
  • Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1982). Socialization in small groups: Temporal changes in individual-group relations doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60297-X
  • Newcomb, T. M. (1956). The prediction of interpersonal attraction. American Psychologist, 11(11), 575-586.
  • Orcutt, J. D. (1973). Societal reaction and the response to deviation in small groups. Social Forces, 52(2), 259-267. doi:10.1093/sf/52.2.259
  • Packer, D. J. (2008). On being both with us and against us: A normative conflict model of dissent in social groups. Personality and Social...
  • Packer, D. J., Fujita, K., & Chasteen, A. L. (2014). The motivational dynamics of dissent decisions: A goal-conflict approach. Social...
  • Packer, D. J., & Miners, C. T. H. (2014). Tough love: The normative conflict model and a goal system approach to dissent decisions. Social...
  • Pennington, D. C. (2002). The Social Psychology of Behaviour in Small Groups,
  • Pinto, I. R., Marques, J. M., Levine, J. M., & Abrams, D. (2016). Membership role and subjective group dynamics: Impact on evaluative...
  • Pinto, I. R., Marques, J. M., Levine, J. M., & Abrams, D. (2010). Membership status and subjective group dynamics: Who triggers the black...
  • Schachter, S. (1951). Deviation, rejection, and communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46(2), 190-207. doi:10.1037/h0062326
  • Sherif, M. (1936). The Psychology of Social Norms,
  • Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations,
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations,...
  • Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1986). The Social Psychology of Groups,
  • Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Social Influence,
  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization...
  • van Prooijen, J. -. (2009). Procedural justice as autonomy regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(6), 1166-1180. doi:10.1037/a0014153
  • Wesselmann, E. D., Williams, K. D., & Wirth, J. H. (2014). Ostracizing group members who can (or cannot) control being burdensome. Human...
  • Williams, K. D. (2007). Ostracism doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085641