Cuando el prejuicio implícito no predice el explícito: versión española de la escala Concern with Acting Prejudiced

• Ana Urbiola ^[1] ; Guillermo B. Willis ^[1] ; Josefa Ruiz-Romero ^[1] ; Miguel Moya ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidad de Granada

     Universidad de Granada

     Granada, España

     
• Localización: International Journal of Social Psychology, Revista de Psicología Social, ISSN-e 1579-3680, ISSN 0213-4748, Vol. 33, Nº 1, 2018, págs. 65-80
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.1080/02134748.2017.1385239
• Títulos paralelos:
  • When implicit prejudice does not predict explicit prejudice: Spanish version of the Concern with Acting Prejudiced scale
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen
  • español

    El objetivo de esta investigación fue adaptar y validar al español la escala Preocupación por Actuar de Manera Prejuiciosa (PAMP). Esta medida evalúa la preocupación por ser una persona prejuiciosa ante los demás o ante uno mismo y la motivación por no desviarse de los principios personales igualitarios. Tras el análisis de validez de contenido, en el Estudio 1 (N = 198) realizamos el análisis exploratorio de la estructura factorial. En el Estudio 2 (N = 383) realizamos un análisis confirmatorio de su estructura unifactorial y se obtuvieron evidencias de validez. En el Estudio 3 (N = 89) examinamos si esta variable modera la relación entre el prejuicio implícito y el explícito. Los resultados confirmaron su estructura unifactorial, sus adecuadas propiedades psicométricas y su validez predictiva. Asimismo, la PAMP moderó la relación entre el prejuicio implícito y explícito. En las personas con baja preocupación por actuar de manera prejuiciosa, el prejuicio implícito y el moderno se relacionaron positivamente; en las personas con una alta preocupación no hubo relación entre estas variables.

  • English

    The aim of this research was to adapt and validate the Concern with Acting Prejudiced (CAP) scale for a Spanish sample. This measure evaluates concern about appearing prejudiced to others or oneself and the motivation not to deviate from personal egalitarian standards. First, we completed the translation and an item content validity analysis. Then, in Study 1 (N = 198), we conducted an exploratory factor analysis. In Study 2 (N = 383), we conducted a confirmatory analysis of the unifactorial structure of the Spanish version of the scale and examined its validity. In Study 3 (N = 89), we explored the moderating role of participants’ concern with acting prejudiced in the relation between implicit prejudice and explicit prejudice. The results confirmed the unifactorial structure of the scale, its appropriate psychometric properties and its predictive validity. Moreover, we confirmed that the CAP moderated the relation between implicit and explicit prejudice. In participants with a low concern with acting prejudiced, implicit prejudice was positively related with modern prejudice; in participants with a high concern with acting prejudiced, these variables were not related.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Akrami, N., & Ekehammar, B. O. (2005). The association between implicit and explicit prejudice: The moderating role of motivation to control...
  • Banse, R., & Gawronski, B. (2003). The scale motivation to act without prejudice: Psychometric properties and validity. [Die skala motivation...
  • Betancor, V., Quiles, M. N., Morera, D., Rodríguez, R., Rodríguez, A., Delgado, N., & Acosta, V. (2002). Creencias sobre las causas de...
  • Blinder, S., Ford, R., & Ivarsflaten, E. (2013). The better angels of our nature: How the antiprejudice norm affects policy and party...
  • Brochu, P. M., Gawronski, B., & Esses, V. M. (2011). The integrative prejudice framework and different forms of weight prejudice: An analysis...
  • Campbell, A. (1971). White Attitudes Toward Black People,
  • Carretero-Dios, H., & Pérez, C. (2007). Standards for the development and review of instrumental studies: Considerations about test selection...
  • Castillo, J. L. Á. (2005). Goals in the reduccion of automatic prejudice: Experiencing the discrepancy. [Las metas en la reducción del prejuicio...
  • Devine, P. G., Plant, E. A., Amodio, D. M., Harmon-Jones, E., & Vance, S. L. (2002). The regulation of explicit and implicit race bias:...
  • Díez Nicolás, J. (2005). Las Dos Caras De La Inmigración,
  • Dunton, B. C., & Fazio, R. H. (1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and...
  • Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The mode model as an integrative framework doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60318-4
  • Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of...
  • Ferrando, P. J., & Chico, E. (2000). A spanish version of the marlowe and crowne's social desirability scale. [Adaptación y análisis...
  • Fiske, S. T., Bergsieker, H. B., Russell, A. M., & Williams, L. (2009). Images of black americans: Then, “Them,” and now, “Obama!”. Du...
  • Gabriel, U., Banse, R., & Hug, F. (2007). Predicting private and public helping behaviour by implicit attitudes and the motivation to...
  • Gamella, J. F. (2011). Historias de éxito. modelos para reducir el abandono escolar de la adolescencia gitana. [success stories: Models for...
  • Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and...
  • Gawronski, B., Peters, K. R., Brochu, P. M., & Strack, F. (2008). Understanding the relations between different forms of racial prejudice:...
  • Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. an improved scoring...
  • Hambleton, R. K. (2004). Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. Adapting educational...
  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). An Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach,
  • Hirsh, A. T., Hollingshead, N. A., Ashburn-Nardo, L., & Kroenke, K. (2015). The interaction of patient race, provider bias, and clinical...
  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal...
  • Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural Equation Modeling: Foundations and Extensions,
  • Legault, L., Gutsell, J. N., & Inzlicht, M. (2011). Ironic effects of antiprejudice messages: How motivational interventions can reduce...
  • McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the modern racism scale. Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism, , 91-125.
  • Monteith, M. J., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Voils, C. I., & Czopp, A. M. (2002). Putting the brakes on prejudice: On the development and operation...
  • Navas, M. S. (1998). New measurement instruments for the new racism. [Nuevos instrumentos de medida para el nuevo racismo] Revista De Psicologia...
  • Plant, E. A., & Devine, P. G. (1998). Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social...
  • Rodríguez-Bailón, R., Ruiz, J., & Moya, M. (2009). The impact of music on automatically activated attitudes: Flamenco and gypsy people....
  • Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Parker, J. G. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol.3.Social,...
  • Stroebe, K., Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2010). Experiencing discrimination: How members of disadvantaged groups can be helped to cope...
  • Urbiola, A., Willis, G. B., Ruiz-Romero, J., & Moya, M. (2014). The reduction of prejudice towards gypsies in real life: Effects of visiting...