Perspectiva Futura de Tiempo, Satisfacción Laboral y Compromiso Organizacional: El efecto mediador de la autoeficacia, la esperanza y la vitalidad

• Daniel Arturo Cernas-Ortiz ^[1] ; Patricia Mercado-Salgado ^[1] ; Mark A. Davis ^[2]
  1. [1] Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México

     Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México

     México

     
  2. [2] University of North Texas

     University of North Texas

     Estados Unidos

     
• Localización: Revista de psicología del trabajo y de las organizaciones = Journal of work and organizational psychology, ISSN 1576-5962, Vol. 34, Nº 1, 2018, págs. 1-9
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.5093/jwop2018a1
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Future time perspective, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment: The mediating effect of self-efficacy, hope, and vitality
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo  1 (pdf)   2 (pdf) 
• Dialnet Métricas: 15 Citas
• Resumen
  • español

    El objetivo de este trabajo es examinar el efecto mediador de la autoficacia, la esperanza y la vitalidad en la relación de la perspectiva futura de tiempo con la satisfacción laboral y el compromiso organizacional. Se aplicó un cuestionario autoinformado a 299 estudiantes de máster con experiencia laboral. Las hipótesis se probaron mediante un análisis de mediación utilizando regresión lineal. Los resultados indican que los tres factores considerados median la relación entre la perspectiva futura de tiempo y la satisfacción laboral. También se encontró que mientras que la autoeficacia y la esperanza median la relación entre la perspectiva futura de tiempo y el compromiso organizacional, la vitalidad no lo hace. Este estudio sugiere que la asociación entre la perspectiva futura de tiempo y las actitudes analizadas no es directa, sino que se transmite, en mayor o menor medida, a través de factores que varían en poder de mediación

  • English

    This study’s objective is to analyze the mediating role of self-efficacy, hope, and vitality in the relationship that future time perspective has with job satisfaction and organizational commitment. A self-reported survey was applied to 299 MBA students with work experience. The hypotheses were tested by means of a mediation analysis utilizing linear regression. The results suggest that the three factors taken into consideration mediate the relationship between future time perspective and job satisfaction. Also, findings indicate that while self-efficacy and hope mediate the relationship between future time perspective and organizational commitment, vitality does not. This study suggests that association between future time perspective and the attitudes under examination is not direct, but rather, is conveyed, to a higher or lower degree, through various factors that differ in mediating power

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Allen, N. y Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal...
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 34, 191-252. https://doi. org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191
  • Bandura, A. y Locke, E. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 87-99. https://doi....
  • Baron, R. y Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical...
  • Brayfield, A. H. y Rothe, H. F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, 307-311. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055617
  • Cernas-Ortiz, D. A. y Davis, M. A. (2016). Future and past negative time perspective influences on job satisfaction and organizational commitment...
  • Colarelli, S. y Arvey, R. (2015). The Biological Foundations of Organizational Behavior, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Corral-Verdugo,V., Fraijo-Sing, B. y Pinheiro, J. (2006). Sustainable behavior and time perspective: Present, past, and future orientations...
  • Epel, E., Bandura, A. y Zimbardo, P. (1999). Escaping hopelessness: The influences of self-efficacy and time perspective on coping with homelessness....
  • Gits, M. y Mitchell, T. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Journal,...
  • Harrison, D., Newman, D. y Roth, P. (2006). How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes...
  • Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY: The...
  • Judge, T. y Bono, J. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits –self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional...
  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Lindell, M. y Whitney, D. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology,...
  • Locke, E. (1969). What is job satisfaction? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4, 309-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/00305073(69)90013-0
  • Locke, E. y Latham, G. (1990). A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Locke, E. y Latham, G. (2009). Has goal setting gone wild, or have its attackers abandoned good scholarship? Academy of Management Perspectives,...
  • Methot, J., Lepak, D., Shipp, A. y Boswell, W. (2017). Good citizen interrupted: Calibrating a theory of citizenship behavior. Academy of...
  • Motowidlo, S. (1996). Orientation toward the job and the organization. En Murphy, K. (Ed.), Individual Differences in Behavior and Organizations...
  • Navarro, J., Roe, R. A. y Artiles, M. I. (2015). Taking time seriously: Changing practices and perspectives in work/organizational psychology....
  • Park, I. y Jung, H. (2015). Relationships among future time perspective, career and organizational commitment, occupational self-efficacy...
  • Park, N., Peterson, C. y Seligman, M. (2004). Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 603-619....
  • Peterson, C., Park, N., Hall, N. y Seligman, M. (2009). Zest and work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 161-172. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.584
  • Porter, L., Steers, R. y Mowday, R. (2007). Do employee attitudes toward organizations matter? The study of employee commitment to organizations....
  • Ryan, R. y Frederick, C. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being, Journal of...
  • Schyns, B. y von Collani, G. (2002). A new occupational self-efficacy scale and its relation to personality constructs and organizational...
  • Shipp, A., Edwards, J. y Lambert, L. (2009). Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present,...
  • Snyder, C. R., Irving, L. y Anderson, J. R. (1991). Hope and health: Measuring the wills and the ways. En C. R. Snyder y D. R. Forsyth (Eds.),...
  • Snyder, C.R., Rand, K., King, E., Feldman, D. y Woodward, J. (2002). “False” hope. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1003-1022. https://doi....
  • Snyder, C.R., Sympson, S., Ybasco, F., Borders, T., Babyak, M. y Higgins, R. (1996). Development and validations of the state hope scale....
  • Sobel, M. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290-312....
  • Spector, P. (2006). Method variance in organizational research. Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221-232. https://...
  • Stolarski, M., Mattews, G., Postek, S., Zimbardo, P. y Bitner, J. (2014). How we feel is a matter of time: Relationship between time perspective...
  • Strobel, M., Tumasjan, A., Spörrle, M. y Welpe, I. (2013). The future starts today, not tomorrow: How future focus promotes organizational...
  • Vinarski-Peretz, H., Binyamin, G. y Carmeli, A. (2011). Subjective relational experiences and employee innovative behaviors in the workplace....
  • Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L. y Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation...
  • Zhang, J. y Howell, R. (2011). Do time perspectives predict unique variance in life satisfaction beyond personality traits? Personality and...
  • Zimbardo, P. y Boyd, J. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social...
  • Zimbardo, P., Keough, K. y Boyd, J. (1997). Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences,...