Parsing complex noun phrases: Effects of hierarchical structure and sentence position on memory load

• Sergio Mota ^[1] ; José Manuel Igoa ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

     Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

     Madrid, España

     
• Localización: The Spanish Journal of Psychology, ISSN 1138-7416, Vol. 20, 2017, 21 págs.
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.1017/sjp.2017.32
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Dialnet Métricas: 1 Cita
• Resumen

  • In this paper, we report two experiments in Spanish designed to find out what kind of processes underlie the online parsing of complex noun phrases (NPs). To that end, we used a ‘click detection’ paradigm coupled with an oral comprehension task with sentences made up of complex NPs comprising embedded prepositional phrases PPs or coordinate NPs. The critical NPs consisted of words or pseudowords, and were inserted either at subject position (Experiment 1) or at object position (Experiment 2) in the sentence. Results show an opposite pattern of RTs to clicks when the complex NP is located at subject (vs. object) position, with the former case showing heavier processing demands as the parser delves deeper into the complex NP, regardless of the internal constituency of the target NP and its lexical content, and the latter yielding the opposite pattern. These results suggest that structural complexity by itself does not determine an increase in processing costs during sentence parsing, which is only apparent in cases involving deferred operations like subject-verb agreement.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Berent I., & Perfetti C. A. (1993). An on-line method in studying music parsing. Cognition, 46, 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(93)90010-S
  • Camacho J. (2003). The structure of coordination conjunction and agreement phenomena in Spanish and other languages. Dordrecht, The Netherlands:...
  • Chomsky N., & Miller G. (1963). Introduction to the formal analysis of natural languages. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter...
  • Cohen L., & Mehler J. (1996). Click-monitoring revisited: An on-line study of sentence comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 24(1), 94–102....
  • Cutler A., & Norris D. (1979). Monitoring sentence comprehension. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic...
  • Eberhard K. M., Cutting J. C., & Bock K. (2005). Making sense of syntax: Number agreement in sentence production. Psychological Review,...
  • Forster K. I., & Forster J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments,...
  • Frazier L., & Clifton C. (1995). Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gibson E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1–76. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1
  • Gibson E. (2000). The dependency locality theory: A distancebased theory of linguistic complexity. In A. Marantz, Y. Miyashita, & W. O’Neil...
  • Gibson E., Desmet T., Grodner D., Watson D., & Ko K. (2005). Reading relative clauses in English. Cognitive Linguistics, 16, 313–353....
  • Gómez D. M., Bion R. A. H., & Mehler J. (2011). The word segmentation process as revealed by click detection. Language and Cognitive Processes,...
  • Guasch M., Boada R., Ferré P., & Sánchez-Casas R. (2013). NIM: A web-based Swiss Army knife to select stimuli for psycholinguistic studies....
  • Hahne A., & Jescheniak J. D. (2001). What’s left if the Jabberwock gets the semantics? An ERP investigation into semantic and syntactic...
  • Hakes D. T., Evans J. S., & Brannon L. L. (1976). Understanding sentences with relative clauses. Memory & Cognition, 4, 283–290. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213177
  • Hawkins J. A. (1994). A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Holmes V. M. (1973). Order of main and subordinate clauses in sentence perception. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 285–293....
  • Holmes V. M., & Forster K. I. (1970). Detection of extraneous signals during sentence recognition. Perception and Psychophysics, 7, 297–301....
  • Hudson R. A. (1996). The difficulty of (so-called) selfembedded structures. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 8, 283–314.
  • Humphries C., Binder J. R., Medler D. A., & Liebenthal E. (2007). Time course of semantic processes during sentence comprehension: An...
  • Hung S.-M., & Hsieh P.-J. (2015). Syntactic processing in the absence of awareness and semantics. Journal of Experimental Psychology:...
  • Johannessen J. B. (1998). Coordination. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Karlsson F. (2010). Multiple final embedding of clauses. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(1), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.1.04kar
  • Konieczny L. (2000). Locality and parsing complexity. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 627–645. https:// doi.org/10.1023/A:1026528912821
  • Lago S., Shalom D. E., Sigman M., Lau E. F., & Phillips C. (2015). Agreement attraction in Spanish comprehension. Journal of Memory and...
  • Levy R. P. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106, 1126–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cognition.2007.05.006
  • Lewis R. L., & Vasishth S. (2005). An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive Science, 29,...
  • Lewis R. L., Vasishth S., & Van Dyke J. A. (2006). Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive...
  • Lobina D. J., Demestre J., & García-Albea J. E. (in press). Disentangling perceptual and psycholinguistic factors in syntactic processing:...
  • MacDonald M. C., Just M. A., & Carpenter P. A. (1992). Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity. Cognitive...
  • MacDonald M. C., Pearlmutter N. J., & Seidenberg M. S. (1994). Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review,...
  • Miller G. A., & Isard S. (1964). Free recall of self-embedded English sentences. Information and Control, 7, 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(64)90310-9
  • Nicenboim B., Vasishth S., Gattei C, Sigman M., & Kliegl R. (2015). Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution....
  • Van Dyke J. A., & Lewis R. L. (2003). Distinguishing effects of structure and decay on attachment and repair: A cue-based parsing account...
  • Vasishth S., & Lewis R. L. (2006). Argument-head distance and processing complexity: Explaining both locality and antilocality effects....
  • Vigliocco G., Butterworth B., & Semenza C. (1995). Constructing subject–verb agreement in speech: The role of semantic and morphological...
  • Wagers M. W., Lau E. F., & Phillips C. (2009). Agreement attraction in comprehension: Representations and processes. Journal of Memory...
  • Yamada Y., & Neville H. J. (2007). An ERP study of syntactic processing in English and nonsense sentences. Brain Research, 1130, 167–180....
  • Yngve V. H. (1960). A model and a hypothesis for language structure. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 104, 444–466.
  • Zhang N. (2010). Coordination in Syntax. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.