Acceso usuarios
Reports an error in "Perceived Challenge, Teacher Support, and Teacher Obstruction as Predictors of Student Engagement" by Anna D. Strati, Jennifer A. Schmidt and Kimberly S. Maier (Journal of Educational Psychology, Advanced Online Publication, Mar 3, 2016, np). In this article, the sixth sentence of the Relations of Challenge and Support subsection of the Results section should read “Results from a baseline null cross-classified model indicated that 53% of the variance in engagement occurred between cell (cross-classification of student and instructional episode), about 37% occurred between-students, and about 10% was attributed to instructional episode.” (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2016-10825-001.) This study explored associations between students’ perceptions of challenge, teacher-provided support and obstruction, and students’ momentary academic engagement in high school science classrooms. Instrumental and emotional dimensions of support and obstruction were examined separately, and analyses tested whether the relationship between challenge and engagement was moderated by teacher support, teacher obstruction, and individual characteristics like gender and grade level. Students’ perceptions of challenge were positively related to their momentary reports of engagement in science learning activities, while teachers’ instrumental support was positively associated with engagement across all levels of perceived challenge. Even though teachers’ provision of emotional support was not predictive of student engagement, teachers’ emotional obstruction was negatively associated with student engagement. Teachers’ instrumental obstruction had less consistent associations with student engagement, and was only associated with declines in engagement during those moments when students perceived greater challenge in class. Both gender and grade level emerged as moderators of the relationship between challenge and engagement. Results are discussed in terms of implications for future research and instructional practice. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved)
