Self-efficacy Matters More Than Interruptions In a Sequential Multitasking Experiment

• Maureen A. Conard ^[1] ; Robert F. Marsh ^[1]
  1. [1] Sacred Heart University

     Sacred Heart University

     Town of Fairfield, Estados Unidos

     
• Localización: Psicológica: Revista de metodología y psicología experimental, ISSN-e 1576-8597, ISSN 0211-2159, Vol. 37, Nº 1, 2016, págs. 15-34
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen

  • Interruptions and multitasking have received a great deal of attention from researchers. The present study is the first to examine task self-efficacy along with interruptions in an experimental multitasking framework. Perceptions of resumption lag times and task rehearsal were also examined. Participants (N= 110) completed a primary task (puzzle) with some being interrupted to pursue a secondary task (a word search) either once or four times.

    Uninterrupted participants completed the puzzle 26% faster than those interrupted once and 30% faster than those interrupted four times. However, self-efficacy predicted performance much more strongly than did interruptions, and therefore should receive more attention in future studies.

    Participants generally disagreed that they experienced resumption lags or task rehearsal. Practically, the results indicate that training to the point of high self-efficacy on tasks will do more to enhance performance than would eliminating interruptions. In reality, such training is likely easier to accomplish.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Abele, A. E. & Spurk, D. (2009). The longitudinal impact of self-efficacy and career goals on objective and subjective career success....
  • Altmann E. M. & Trafton J. G. (2002) Memory for goals: An activation-based model. Cognitive Science, 26, 39-83.
  • Altmann, E. M., Trafton, J. G., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2013). Momentary interruptions can derail the train of thought. Journal of Experimental...
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215
  • Bassi, M., Steca, P., Delle Fave, A., & Caprara, G. V. (2007). Academic self-efficacy beliefs and quality of experience in learning. Journal...
  • Bosco, F. A., Aguinis, H., Singh, K., Field, J. G., & Pierce, C. A. (2014, October 13). Correlational effect size benchmarks. Journal...
  • Bowman, L.L., Levine, L.E., Waite, B.M., & Gendron, M. (2010). Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging,...
  • Cades, D. M., Boehm-Davis, D. A., Trafton, J. G., & Monk, C. A. (2011). Mitigating disruptive effects of interruptions through training:...
  • Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 62-83.
  • Conard, M. A. & Marsh, R. F. (2014). Interest level improves learning but does not moderate the effects of interruptions: An experiment...
  • Conway, A.R.A., Cowan, N. & Bunting, M. F. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity....
  • Engle, R.W. (2002). Working memory as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19-23.
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression...
  • Fox, A.B., Rosen, J., & Crawford, M. (2009). Distractions, distractions: Does instant messaging affect college students’ performance on...
  • Fritz, M. S. & MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18, 233-239.
  • Giofre, D., Mammarella, I. C., Ronconi, L., & Cornoldi, C. (2013). Visuospatial working memory in intuitive geometry, and in academic...
  • Gonzalez, V. & Mark G. (2004). Constant, constant multi-tasking craziness: Managing multiple working spheres. Proceedings of the Association...
  • Grundgeiger, T., Sanderson, P., MacDougall, H. G., & Venkatesh, B. (2010). Interruption management in the intensive care unit: Predicting...
  • Hambrick, D. Z., Oswald, F. L., Darowski, E. S., Rench, T. A. & Brou, R. (2010). Predictors of multitasking performance in a synthetic...
  • Hodgetts, H. M. & Jones D. M. (2006a). Contextual cues aid recovery from interruption: The role of associative activation. Journal of...
  • Hodgetts, H. M. & Jones D. M. (2006b). Interruptions in the tower of London task: Support for a goal-activation approach. Journal of Experimental...
  • Hodgetts, H. M., Vachon, F., & Tremblay, S. (2014). Background sound impairs interruption recovery in dynamic task situations: Procedural...
  • Jett, Q. R. & George J. M. (2003). Work interrupted: A closer look at the role of interruptions in organizational life. Academy of Management...
  • Kreckler, S., Catchpole, K., Bottomley, M., Handa, A., & McCulloch, P. (2008). Interruptions during drug rounds: An observational study....
  • Leroy, S. (2009). Why is it so hard to do my work? The challenge of attention residue when switching between work tasks. Organizational Behavior...
  • Lucas, J. L., Wanberg, C. R., & Zytowski, D. G. (1997). Development of a career task self- efficacy scale: The Kuder Task Self-Efficacy...
  • Maddux, J. E., & Gosselin, J. T. (2012). Self-efficacy. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.) Handbook of Self and Identity. New York:...
  • Mark, G., Gudith, D., & Klocke, U. (2008). The cost of interrupted work: More speed and stress. Proceeding of the Twenty-Sixth Annual...
  • Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive control and multiple task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms....
  • Monk C., Trafton J. & Boehm-Davis D. (2008). The effect of interruption duration and demand on resuming suspended goals. Journal of Experimental...
  • O*Net. (2014). Retrieved January 4, 2014 from http://www.onetonline.org
  • Parasuraman, R. (2011). Neuroergonomics: Brain, cognition, and performance at work. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 181-186.
  • Ratwani, R. M. & Trafton, J. G. (2006). Helpful or harmful? Examining the effects of interruptions on task performance. In Proceedings...
  • PRNewswire (2011, April 2). New Allstate Survey Shows Americans Think They Are Great Drivers-Habits Tell a Difference. Retrieved June 13,...
  • Speier, C., Valachich, J. S., & Vessey, I. (1999). The influence of task interruption on individual decision making: An information overload...
  • Speier, C., Vessey, I., & Valachich, J. S. (2003) The effects of interruptions, task complexity, and information presentation on computer-supported...
  • Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 1998, 124,...
  • Trafton, J. G., Altmann E. M. & Ratwani, R. M. (2011). A memory for goals model of sequence errors. Cognitive Systems Research, 12, 134-143.
  • Trafton, J. G., & Monk, C. M. (2008). Task Interruptions. In D. A. Boehm-Davis (Ed.), Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, Volume 3.
  • Wickens, C. D. & Hollands, J. G. (2000). Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Wickens, C. D. & McCarley, J. S. (2008). Applied Attention Theory. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Word search. (2015, April 18). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 16:44, June 12, 2015, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Word_search&oldid=657041665