Views Regarding National Policies about Illicit Drugs: A Pilot Study among People Living in Bogota

• Wilson López López ^[1] ; Claudia Pineda Marín ^[2] ; Etienne Mullet ^[3]
  1. [1] Pontificia Javeriana University, Bogotá, Colombia
  2. [2] Santo Tomas University, Bogotá, Colombia
  3. [3] Institute of Advanced Studies (EPHE), France

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: Psicológica: Revista de metodología y psicología experimental, ISSN-e 1576-8597, ISSN 0211-2159, Vol. 35, Nº 3, 2014, págs. 635-651
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen

  • The present study investigated the views regarding governmental policies for the control of drugs in people living in Bogota. It used the methodology of Functional Measurement. Participants were not instructed to judge the acceptability of components of drug policies (e.g., acceptability of needle exchange programs) but the acceptability of the policy itself (e.g., acceptability of a policy of complete prohibition). One hundred eighty-five participants (mean age = 35) who lived in different areas of the city were presented with a series of 12 vignettes. These vignettes were composed according to a two within-subject orthogonal factor design: (a) existence of information campaigns regarding the dangerousness of drugs, and (b) current state policy regarding soft and hard drugs (e.g., complete laissezfaire, complete prohibition, regulation policy for both soft and hard drugs).

    The question was “To what extent do you think that, in these circumstances, the position of the State is politically acceptable?” Through K-means analyses, an interpretable six-cluster solution was identified.

    These clusters were called radical constructionists (51%), progressive prohibitionists (22%), free trade libertarians (11%), undecided (10%), and cultural conservatives (6%). Public opinion in Bogota seems to be at variance with public policy regarding the management of the illicit drug issue.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Anderson, N. H. (1982). Methods of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.
  • Anderson, N. H. (2008). Unified social cognition. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Blendon, R. J., & Young, J. T. (1998). The public and the war in illicit drugs. Journal of American Medical Association, 279, 827-832.
  • Boyum, D. (2001). Prohibition and legalization: Beyond the false dichotomy. Social Research 68, 865-868.
  • Bretteville-Jensen, A. L. (2006). To legalize or not to legalize? Economic approaches to the decriminalization of drugs. Substance Use and...
  • Camacho, A., Gaviria A., & Rodríguez, C. (2011). El consumo de droga en Colombia. En Gaviria, A. & Mejía, D. (Eds.), Políticas antidroga...
  • Camus, J., Muñoz Sastre, M. T., Sorum, P. C., & Mullet, E. (2013). French people's positions regarding national policies about illicit...
  • Costes, J. M., Le Nézet, O., Spilka, S., & Lafitteau, C. (2010). Dix ans d’évolution des perceptions et des opinons de Français sur les...
  • Courtwright, D. T. (1982). Dark paradise: Opiate addiction in America before 1940. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Friedman, M. (1991). Interview on the drug of war. Available at http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/Misc/friedm1.htm. Retrieved February 12th,...
  • Gaviria, A. & Mejía, D. (2011). Políticas antidroga en Colombia: Éxitos, fracasos y extravíos. Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes.
  • Goode, E. (1998). Strange bedfellows: Ideology, politics, and drug legalization. Society, 35, 18-27.
  • Hofmans, J., & Mullet, E. (2013). Towards unveiling individual differences in different stages of information processing: A clustering-based...
  • Hopwood, M., Brener, L., Frankland, A., & Treloar, C. (2010). Assessing community support for harm reduction services: Comparing two measures....
  • Houston, A. (2010). Budding prospects: Fueled by young activists and serious funds, the legalization movement is poised for big gains. The...
  • Jelsma, M. (2011). The development of international drug control: Lessons learned and strategic challenges for the future. Working paper prepared...
  • Jenner, M. S. (2011). International drug trafficking: A global problem with a domestic solution. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies,...
  • López-López, W., Pineda Marín, C., Murcia León, M. C., Perilla Garzón, D. C., & Mullet, E. (2013). Forgiving the perpetrators of violence:...
  • Millhorn, M., Monaghan, M., Montero, D., Reyes, M., Roman, T., Tollasken, R., & Walls, R. (2009). North Americans’ attitudes toward illegal...
  • Nadelmann, E. (2006). La reducción de los daños de la prohibición de las drogas en las Américas. En Camacho, A (Eds.), Narcotráfico: Europa,...
  • Neto, F., Pinto, C., & Mullet, E. (2013). The acceptability of military humanitarian interventions. International Perspectives in Psychology,...
  • Sterling, E. E. (1991). What should we do about drugs? Vital Speeches of the Day, 62, 626-632.
  • Timberlake, J. M., Rasinski, K. A., & Lock, E. D. (2001). Effects of conservative sociopolitical attitudes on public support for drug...
  • Treloar, C., & Fraser, S. (2007). Public opinion on needle and syringe programmes: Avoiding assumptions for policy and practice. Drug...
  • Uchtehagen, A. (2009). Heroin-assisted treatment in Switzerland: A case study in policy change. Addiction, 105, 29-37.
  • Yacoubian, G. S. (2007). Assessing the relationship between marijuana availability and marijuana use: A legal and sociological comparison...
  • Zorro, C. (2011). Políticas de desarrollo alternativo en Colombia (1982-2009). In A. Gaviria, & D. Mejía. (Eds.), Políticas antidroga...