Status-Relevant Experiences and Conspicuous Consumption – the Moderating Role of Prenatal Androgen Exposure

• Gert Cornelissen ^[1] ; Javier Palacios-Fenech ^[1]
  1. [1] Universitat Pompeu Fabra

     Universitat Pompeu Fabra

     Barcelona, España

     
• Localización: The Spanish Journal of Psychology, ISSN 1138-7416, Vol. 19, 2016, 9 págs.
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.1017/sjp.2016.52
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • In this paper we study consumers’ interest in acquiring and displaying expensive luxury products. Based on recent insights in consumer psychology, which build on developments in evolutionary biology, we consider luxury products as “costly signals”: wasteful and costly goods, whose purpose is to communicate one’s biological fitness, and social status, to others. In line with previous research, we show that experiences that trigger mate attraction goals (Study 1: Exposure to others in bathing outfit) or status display goals (Study 2: Experiencing a vicarious victory of one’s favorite sports team) can increase people’s interest in luxury products. However, we demonstrate that some individuals are predictably more responsive to those experiences than others. We used a physiological measure (the proportion of the length of the index finger and ring finger of the right hand, 2D:4D) as a proxy for individual differences in exposure to prenatal androgens (i.e., testosterone). This measure has been related to dominant and competitive behavior later in life. We predict and find that individuals with a low 2D:4D (i.e., high exposure to prenatal androgens) were more responsive to the status-relevant experiences: they became more interested in luxury goods after these experiences. This was not the case for high 2D:4D individuals.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Aiken L. S., & West S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Archer J. (2006). Testosterone and human aggression: An evaluation of the challenge hypothesis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews,...
  • Bellezza S., Gino F., & Keinan A. (2014). The red sneakers effect: Inferring status and competence from signals of nonconformity. Journal...
  • Bernhardt P. C., Dabbs J. M. Jr, Fielden J. A., & Lutter C. D. (1998). Testosterone changes during vicarious experiences of winning and...
  • Boone J. L. (1998). The evolution of magnanimity. Human Nature, 9(1), 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12110998-1009-y
  • Booth A., Shelley G., Mazur A., Tharp G., & Kittok R. (1989). Testosterone, and winning and losing in human competition. Hormones and...
  • Brown W. M., Hines M., Fane B. A., & Breedlove S. M. (2002). Masculinized finger length patterns in human males and females with congenital...
  • Bruner J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123–152.
  • Cummins D. (2005). Dominance, status, and social hierarchies. The handbook of evolutionary psychology. (pp. 676–697). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley...
  • Drèze X., & Nunes J. C. (2009). Feeling superior: The impact of loyalty program structure on consumers’ perceptions of status. Journal...
  • Eisenegger C., Haushofer J., & Fehr E. (2011). The role of testosterone in social interaction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 263–271....
  • Griskevicius V., Tybur J. M., Sundie J. M., Cialdini R. B., Miller G. F., & Kenrick D. T. (2007). Blatant benevolence and conspicuous...
  • Haselton M. G., Mortezaie M., Pillsworth E. G., Bleske-Rechek A., & Frederick D. A. (2007). Ovulatory shifts in human female ornamentation:...
  • Hayes A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford...
  • Hönekopp J., & Schuster M. (2010). A meta-analysis on 2D:4D and athletic prowess: Substantial relationships but neither hand out-predicts...
  • Janssens K., Pandelaere M., van den Bergh B., Millet K., Lens I., & Roe K. (2011). Can buy me love: Mate attraction goals lead to perceptual...
  • Josephs R. A., Newman M. L., Brown R. P., & Beer J. M. (2003). Status, testosterone, and human intellectual performance: Stereotype threat...
  • Josephs R. A., Sellers J. G., Newman M. L., & Mehta P. H. (2006). The mismatch effect: When testosterone and status are at odds. Journal...
  • Lens I., Driesmans K., Pandelaere M., & Janssens K. (2012). Would male conspicuous consumption capture the female eye? Menstrual cycle...
  • Madrigal R., & Dalakas V. (2008). Consumer psychology of sport: More than just a game. In C. P. Haugtvedt, P. M. Herr, & F. R. Kardes...
  • Mandel N., Petrova P. K., & Cialdini R. B. (2006). Images of success and the preference for luxury brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology,...
  • Manning J. T. (2002). Digit ratio: A pointer to fertility, behavior, and health. New Jersey, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Manning J. T., Barley L., Walton J., Lewis-Jones D. I., Trivers R. L., Singh D., … Szwed A. (2000). The 2nd:4th digit ratio, sexual dimorphism,...
  • Manning J. T., Scutt D., Wilson J., & Lewis-Jones D. I. (1998). The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: A predictor of sperm numbers and...
  • Maynard Smith J., & Price G. R. (1973). The logic of animal conflict. Nature, 246, 15–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ 246015a0
  • Mazur A., & Booth A. (1998). Testosterone and dominance in men. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 353–363. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X98001228
  • Mazur A., & Lamb T. A. (1980). Testosterone, status, and mood in human males. Hormones and Behavior, 14, 236–246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0018-506X(80)90032-X
  • Miller G. F. (2000). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
  • Miller G. F., & Todd P. M. (1998). Mate choice turns cognitive. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 190–198. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01169-3
  • Miller G., Tybur J. M., & Jordan B. D. (2007). Ovulatory cycle effects on tip earnings by lap dancers: Economic evidence for human estrus?...
  • Millet K., & Dewitte S. (2008). A subordinate status position increases the present value of financial resources for low 2D:4D men. American...
  • Nelissen R. M. A., & Meijers M. H. C. (2011). Social benefits of luxury brands as costly signals of wealth and status. Evolution and Human...
  • Oliveira T., Gouveia M. J., & Oliveira R. F. (2009). Testosterone responsiveness to winning and losing experiences in female soccer players....
  • Ronay R., & von Hippel W. (2010). Power, testosterone, and risk-taking. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 473–482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.671
  • Roney J. R. (2003). Effects of visual exposure to the opposite sex: Cognitive aspects of mate attraction in human males. Personality and Social...
  • Rucker D. D., & Galinsky A. D. (2008). Desire to acquire: Powerlessness and compensatory consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 35,...
  • Ryckmans J., Millet K., & Warlop L. (2015). The influence of facial characteristics on the relation between male 2D:4D and dominance....
  • Seligman M. E. P., Railton P., Baumeister R. F., & Sripada C. (2013). Navigating into the future or driven by the past. Perspectives on...
  • Stenstrom E., Saad G., Nepomuceno M. V., & Mendenhall Z. (2011). Testosterone and domain-specific risk: Digit ratios (2D:4D and rel2)...
  • Stockley P., & Campbell A. (2013). Female competition and aggression: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the...
  • Van den Bergh B., & Dewitte S. (2006). Digit ratio (2D: 4D) Moderates the impact of sexual cues on men’s decisions in ultimatum games....
  • Van der Meij L., Almela M., Buunk A. P., Dubbs S., & Salvador A. (2012). 2D:4D in men is related to aggressive dominance but not to sociable...
  • Van der Meij L., Almela M., Hidalgo V., Villada C., Ijzerman H., van Lange P. A. M., & Salvador A. (2012). Testosterone and cortisol release...
  • Veblen T. (1899). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions. New York, NY: Macmillan Co.
  • Von Rueden C., Gurven M., & Kaplan H. (2011). Why do men seek status? Fitness payoffs to dominance and prestige. Biological Sciences,...
  • Zahavi A. (1975). Mate selection—A selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53(1), 205–214. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3
  • Zahavi A., & Zahavi A. (1997). The handicap principle: A missing piece of Darwin’s puzzle. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.