Ciudadanía, políticos y expertos en la toma de decisiones políticas: la percepción de las cualidades de los actores políticos importan

• Adrián del Río ; Clemente J. Navarro ^[1] ; Joan Font ^[2]
  1. [1] Universidad Pablo de Olavide

     Universidad Pablo de Olavide

     Sevilla, España

     
  2. [2] Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas

     Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas

     Madrid, España

     
• Localización: REIS: Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, ISSN 0210-5233, Nº 154, 2016, págs. 83-102
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.5477/cis/reis.154.83
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Citizens, Politicians and Experts in Political Decision-Making: The Importance of Perceptions of the Qualities of Political Actors
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Dialnet Métricas: 5 Citas
• Resumen
  • español

    ¿Qué factores explican que la ciudadanía prefiera políticos, ciudadanos o expertos en la toma de decisiones políticas? Este artículo demuestra que la falta de apoyo al sistema político desempeña un papel relevante. A su vez, encontramos que la valoración que hace la ciudadanía sobre las cualidades morales y técnicas de los actores tradicionales en democracia (élite política y ciudadanía) ayuda a perfilar mejor la naturaleza de sus preferencias. A partir del análisis de los datos de una encuesta del CIS del año 2011, mostramos que los factores mencionados son relevantes para entender cómo se vertebran las preferencias ciudadanas sobre quién debe tomar las decisiones políticas en democracia. A su vez, nuestros resultados sostienen algunos de los argumentos de Hibbing y Theiss-Morse, mientras que otros deben ser revisados.

  • English

    What factors explain whether citizens prefers politicians, citizens or experts to make political decisions? In this article, we show that level of support for the political system plays an important role. In addition, citizens? perceptions of the moral and technical capacities of the traditional actors in democracy (political elite and citizens) help to provide a better picture of the nature of citizens? preferences. Through analysis of survey data, we show that the aforesaid factors are relevant to understand the vectors of citizens? preferences in who should make the political decisions in democracy. Moreover, our results support some of Hibbing and Theiss-Morse's arguments, while others should be revised.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Almond, Gabriel A. and Verba, Sidney ([1963] 1989). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Newbury Park: Sage. Barber,...
  • Bengtsson, Asa (2012). “Citizens’ Perceptions of Political Processes. A Critical Evaluation of Preference Consistency and Survey Items”. Revista Internacional...
  • Bengtsson, Asa and Mattila, Mikko (2009). “Direct Democracy and its Critics: Support for Direct Democracy and “Stealth” Democracy in Finland”. West...
  • Bowler, Shaun; Donovan, Todd and Karp, Jeffrey (2003). “Popular Attitudes towards Direct Democracy”. Article presented at the American Political Science...
  • Clark, N. Terry and Navarro, J. Clemente (2009). La nueva cultura política. Buenos Aires: Miño y Dávila.
  • Coffe, Hilde and Michels, Ank (2012). “Education and Support for Representative, Direct and Stealth Democracy”. Article presented at the American Political...
  • Cohen, Joshua (1997). “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy”. In: Bohman, J. and Regh, W. (eds). Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason...
  • Dalton, Russel (1984). “Cognitive Mobilization and Partisan Dealignment in Advanced Industrial Democracies”. Journal of Politics, 46(1): 264-284.
  • Dalton, Russel (2008). “Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation”. Political Studies, 56 (14): 76-98.
  • Dalton, Russel; Bürklin, Wilhelm and Drummond, Andrew (2001). “Public Opinion and Direct Democracy”. Journal of Democracy, 12(4): 141-153.
  • Della Porta, Donatella and Diani, Mario (2011). Los movimientos sociales. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas and Editorial Complutense.
  • Deth, Jan W.; Montero, J. Ramón and Westholm, Anders (2007). Citizenship, Involvement in European Democracies. A Comparative Analysis. London:...
  • Dryzek, J. S. (2002). Deliberative democracy and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Easton, David (1975). “A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support”. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4): 435-457.
  • Escobar Mercado, Modesto; Fernández Macías, Enrique and Bernardi, Fabrizio (2009). Análisis de datos con Stata. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones...
  • Fishkin, James S. and Lasset, James (2003). Debating Deliberative Democracy. Malden Mass: Blackwell.
  • Floss, Daniela (2008). “How to Tell what Political Processes People Want? Measuring Citizens’ Process Preferences in Surveys”. Working paper...
  • Font, Joan; Navarro, J. Clemente; Wojcieszak Magdalena and Alarcón, Pablo (2012). ¿“Democracia sigilosa” en España? Preferencias de la ciudadanía...
  • Font, Joan; Wojcieszak, Magdalena and Navarro, J. Clemente (2015). “Participation, Representation and Expertise: Citizen Preferences for Political Decision-making...
  • Frank, Thomas (2000). “The Rise of Market Populism: America’s New Secular Religion”. The Nation, 30.
  • Gangl, Amy (2007). “Examining Citizens’ Beliefs that Government Should Run Like Business”. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(4): 661-670.
  • Held, D. (1987). Models of Democracy. Stanford: Standford University Press.
  • Hibbing, John R. and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth (2002). Stealth Democracy. Americans’ Beliefs about how Government Should Work. Cambridge: Cambridge...
  • Inglehart, Ronald (1977). The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton...
  • Inglehart, Ronald (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization. Cultural, Economics and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton...
  • Kaufmann, Daniel; Kraay, Aart and Mastruzzi, Massimo (2010). “The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues”. World Bank...
  • Keele, Luke (2007). “Social Capital and the Dynamics of Trust in Government”. American Journal of Political Science, 51(2): 241-254.
  • Leuffen, Dirk (2007). “Case Selection and Selection Bias in Small-n Research”. In: Gschwend, T. and Schimmelfennig, F. (eds). Research Design...
  • Levi, Margaret and Stoker, Laura (2000). “Political Ttrust and Trustworthiness”. Annual Review of Political Studies, 38(1): 475-507.
  • McAllister, I. (1999). “The Economic Performance of Governments”. In: Norris, P. (ed.). Critical Citizens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Miller, H. Arthur (1984). “Review of ‘The Confi dence Gap: Business, Labor and Government in the Public Mind’, by Seymour Martin Lipset and...
  • Montero, J. Ramón and Morlino, Leonardo (1996). “Legitimidad y Democracia en el sur de Europa”. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas (REIS),...
  • Montero, J. Ramón; Gunther, Richard and Torcal, Mariano (1998). “Actitudes hacia la democracia en España: legitimidad, descontento y desafección”....
  • Morgan, Stephen L. and Winship, C. (2007). Counterfactual and Causal Inference. Methods and Principles for Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge...
  • Navarro, J. Clemente (2012). “Procesos y confi anza política: ¿quiénes deben ser virtuosos?”. In: Font, J.; Navarro, J. C.; Wojcieszak, M....
  • Neblo, A. Michael; Esterling, M. Kevin; Kennedy, P. Ryan; Lazer, M. David and Sokhey, E. Anand (2010). “Who Wants to Deliberate and why?”....
  • Neidermayer, Oskar and Westle, Bettina (1995). “A Typology of Orientations”. In: Neidermayer, O. and Sinnot, R. (eds). Public Opinion and...
  • Norris, Pippa (ed.) (1999). Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Norris, Pippa (2002). Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pitkin, Hanna F. (1967). The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Putnam, Robert ([1995] 2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Sánchez-Cuenca Ignacio (2014). La impotencia democrática. Madrid: Catarata.
  • Schneider, L. Silke (2010). “Nominal Comparability Is not Enough: (In-)equivalence of Construct Validity of Cross-national Measures of Educational Attainment...
  • Schumpeter, Joseph ([1942] (1987). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (6th edition). London: Unwin Paperbacks.
  • Seawright, Jason and Gerring, John (2008). “Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research”. Political Research Quaterly, 31: 294-308.
  • Sunstein, R. Cass (1995). Democracy and the Problem of Free Sspeech. New York: Free Press.
  • Sunstein, R. Cass (1999). Free Market and Social Justice. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Torcal, Mariano and Magalhães, Pedro C. (2010). “Cultura política en el sur de Europa: un estudio comparado en busca de su excepcionalismo”. In:...
  • Torcal, Mariano and Montero, J. Ramón (eds). (2006). Political Disaffection in Contemporary Democracies: Social Capital and Politics. London:...
  • Torcal, Mariano; Montero, J. Ramón and Teorell, Jan. (2006). “La participación política en España: modos y niveles en perspectiva comparada”....
  • Verba, Sidney; Lehman Schlozman, Kay and Brady, E. Henry (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University...
  • Vergé, Tània (2007). “Modelos alternativos de participación ciudadana en los partidos políticos españoles: un estudio del PSOE, el PP e IU”....
  • Wojcieszak M. and Alarcón, P. (2012). “El papel de la intensidad de las actitudes y de la participación”. In: Font, J.; Navarro J. C.; Wojcieszak...
  • Zmerli, Sonja; Newton, Kenneth and Montero, J. Ramón (2007). “Trust in Ppeople, Confi dence in Political Institutions and Satisfaction with...