La distinción entre organizaciones públicas y privadas: diferencias en la gestión de instalaciones deportivas

• Autores: Vicente Martínez Tur, Pilar González Navarro, José Ramos López, Nuria Tordera Santamatilde, Isabel Rodríguez Molina, José María Peiró Silla
• Localización: Revista de psicología del trabajo y de las organizaciones = Journal of work and organizational psychology, ISSN 1576-5962, Vol. 11, Nº 32, 1995, págs. 27-50
• Idioma: español
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (htm)
• Dialnet Métricas: 1 Cita
• Resumen
  • español

    El objetivo de este trabajo consiste en analizar las diferencias en la forma de desempeñar los puestos gerenciales en organizaciones deportivas y analizar la importancia de la distinción público-privado en dichas diferencias. En primer lugar se hace una revisión de la evidencia empírica sobre características diferentes entre las organizaciones públicas y privadas. A continuación, se consideran las críticas sobre dicha distinción y se discuten las razones o dimensiones para definir las categorías organizacionales públicas y privadas. Se incluye la propuesta de un continuo público-privado. En tercer lugar, se analiza la validez de diferentes modos de diferenciar las organizaciones en función de su propiedad (distinción dicotómica, existencia de un continuo, clasificación multidimensional) para distinguir la gestión entre organizaciones públicas y privadas. Finalmente se presentan los resultados de un estudio empírico sobre una muestra de 73 instalaciones deportivas, comparando las instalaciones públicas y privadas mediante dos categorizaciones distintas: dicotómica y multi-categorial (para adaptar el continuo a un restringido número de grupos).

  • English

    The aim of this paper is to deep study differences in the way managerial jobs are performed in sport organizations, and analyze the importance of public private distinction in these differences. First, empirical evidence about different characteristics between public and private organizations are reviewed. Afterwards, criticism about such distinction are considered, and reasons or dimensions to define public and private organizational categories are discussed. The proposal of a public-private «continuum» is included. Third, validity of dichotomy, continuum and other dimensions to distinguish between public and private organizations to be applied to sport facilities are analyzed. Finally, results of an empirical test in a sample of 73 sport facilities are presented, comparing public and private facilities across two categorizations: dichotomous and multi-categorical (to adapt continuum to a restricted number of groups).

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Ackroyd, S.; Hughes, J. A. y Soothill, K. (1989). Public Sector Services and their Management. Journal of Management Studies, 26 (6), 603-619.
  • Allison, G. T. (1979). Public and private management: are they fundamentally alike in unimportant respects? Public Management Rescarch Conference...
  • Baldwind, J. N. (1987). Public versus private: Not that different, not that consequential. Public Personnel Management, 16 (2),181-193-
  • Benn, S. 1. y Gaus, G. F. (1983). Public and private in social life. New York: St Martin's Press.
  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). The Competent Manager. Wiley.
  • Bozeman, B. (1987). All Organizations are public. JosseyBass.
  • Choudhry, S. (1988). Occupational level and job involvement: a comparative study of public and private sectors employees. Journal of the Indian...
  • Flynn, N. (1989). Public Sector Services. En P. Jones (Ed.): Management in Service Industries (pp. 96-107). London: Pitman.
  • Gunn, L. (1987). Perspectives on public management. Fri Kooiman, J. y Eliassen, K. A. (Ed.): Managing Public Organizations. London: Sage.
  • Hafsi, T. y Koenig, C. (1988). The StateSOE Relationship: some patterns. Journal of Managenient Studies, 25 (3), 235249.
  • Hannaway, J. (1989). Managers Managing. Oxford University Press.
  • Harrow, J. y Willcocks, L. (1990). Public Services Management: Activities, initiatives and limits to learning. Journal of Managernent Studies,...
  • Heruy, 1. P. (1992). The Politics of Leisure Policy.
  • Kooiman, J. y Elliasen, K. A. (eds.) (1987). Managing Public Organizations. London: Sage.
  • Lindbloom, C. E. (1977). Politics and markets. New York: Basic Books.
  • Marshall, V. and Cacioppe, R. (1986). A survey of differences in communication between managers and subordinates. Leadership and Organization...
  • Mascarenhas, B. (1989). Domains of State owned, privately held and publicly traded firms in international competition. Administrative Science...
  • Molz, R. (1989). Privatization of Government Enterprise: The challenge to Management. Management International Journal, 29 (4), 29-44.
  • Perry, J. L. y Rainey, H. G. (1988). The public private distinction in organization theory: A critique and research strategy. Academy of Management...
  • Ramos, J. (1993). Gestión de instalaciones deportivas: Análisis del rol del gerente. Tesis Doctoral. Universitat de Valéncia.
  • Rea, D. M. (1989). Strategy in public sector service organisations. En P. Jones (Ed.): Management in Service Industries (146-159. London:...
  • Roth, V. J. y Bozinoff, L. (1989). Consumer satisfaction with government services. Service Industries Journal, 9 (4), 2943
  • Tonikins, C. R. (1987). Achieving Econoniy, Efficiency and Effectiveness in the Public Sector. London: Kogan Page.
  • Warasley, G. L. y Zald, M. N. (1973). The political economy of public organizations. Lexington: Lexington.
  • Zald, M. N. (1978). On the social control of industries. Socialforces, 57, 79-101.