Propiedades psicométricas de la versión española del cuestionario de creencias sobre la evaluación por pares

• Nicolás Ruiz-Robledillo ^[1] ; Violeta Clement-Carbonell ^[1] ; Rosario Ferrer-Cascales ^[1] ; Borja Costa-López ^[1] ; Cristian Alcocer-Bruno ^[1] ; Juan Vela-Bermejo ^[1] ; Natalia Albaladejo-Blázquez ^[1]
  1. [1] Universitat d'Alacant

     Universitat d'Alacant

     Alicante, España

     
• Localización: Psicología educativa, ISSN 1135-755X, Vol. 31, Nº. 2, 2025, págs. 141-152
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.5093/psed2025a12
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Beliefs about the Peer Feedback Questionnaire
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo  1    2  
• Resumen
  • español

    La evaluación por pares, en la que el alumnado evalúa el trabajo de sus compañeros, potencia las habilidades personales y profesionales en educación. Sin embargo, faltan herramientas para analizar las creencias en esta práctica en España. El Beliefs about Peer Feedback Questionnaire (BPFQ) evalúa las creencias de los estudiantes universitarios con buenas propiedades psicométricas. Este estudio adapta el cuestionario al español y examina sus propiedades psicométricas, además de las diferencias entre áreas de conocimiento. En el estudio instrumental han participado 607 alumnos de la Universidad de Alicante. Los resultados confirman la estructura de cuatro dimensiones, además de un modelo bifactorial, que incluye tanto el factor general como las subescalas del cuestionario, y la consistencia interna del cuestionario en español. Estudiantes de Educación y Ciencias mostraron mayor aceptación de la evaluación por pares que los de Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas. El BPFQ es válido y fiable para evaluar creencias estudiantiles sobre la revisión por pares, siendo útil para analizar la introducción de nuevos sistemas de evaluación de compañeros en la universidad.

  • English

    Peer evaluation, in which students assess their peers’ work, promotes personal and professional skills in education. However, there is a lack of tools to analyze beliefs about this practice in Spain. The Beliefs about Peer Feedback Questionnaire (BPFQ) assesses attitudes and beliefs in university students with good psychometric properties. This study adapts the questionnaire to Spanish and examines its psychometric properties, as well as the differences between knowledge fields. A total of 607 students from the University of Alicante participated in this instrumental study. The results substantiated the four-dimensional structure and a bifactor model, consisting of both the general factor and the four subscales, and the internal consistency of the questionnaire in Spanish. Students from Education and Science showed greater acceptance of peer evaluation than students from Social and Legal Sciences. The BPFQ is a valid and reliable questionnaire for assessing student beliefs about peer review, being useful for evaluating the introduction of new peer review systems at the university.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Alemdag, E. y Yildirim, Z. (2022). Effectiveness of online regulation scaffolds on peer feedback provision and uptake: A mixed methods study....
  • Alqassab, M., Strijbos, J.-W., Panadero, E., Ruiz, J. F., Warrens, M. y To, J. (2023). A Systematic review of peer assessment design elements....
  • Ashenafi, M. M. (2017). Peer-assessment in higher education twentyfirst century practices, challenges and the way forward. Assessment &...
  • Barkley, E. F., Cross, K. P. y Major, C. H. (2014). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Boud, D. (1990). Assessment and the promotion of academic values. Studies in Higher Education, 15(1), 101-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/030750790...
  • Boud, D., Cohen, R. y Sampson, J. (1999). Peer learning and assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 413-426. https://doi....
  • Browne, M. W. y Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230-258. https://doi.org/10.117...
  • Burgess, A. y Mellis, C. (2015). Feedback and assessment for clinical placements: Achieving the right balance. Advances in Medical Education...
  • Carless, D. (2022). From teacher transmission of information to student feedback literacy: Activating the learner role in feedback processes....
  • Carlsson Hauff, J. y Nilsson, J. (2022). Students’ experience of making and receiving peer assessment: The effect of self-assessed knowledge...
  • Carretero-Dios, H. y Pérez, C. (2007). Standards for the development and review of instrumental studies: Considerations about test selection...
  • Cheng, W. y Warren, M. (1997). Having second thoughts: Student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise. Studies in Higher...
  • Darvishi, A., Khosravi, H., Sadiq, S. y GaÅ¡evi , D. (2022). Incorporating AI and learning analytics to build trustworthy peer assessment...
  • Davis, S., Duane, B., Loxley, A. y Quigley, D. (2022). The evaluation of an evidence-based model of feedback implemented on an undergraduate...
  • Deneen, C. C. y Hoo, H.-T. (2021). Connecting teacher and student assessment literacy with self-evaluation and peer feedback. Assessment &...
  • Dochy, F., Segers, M. y Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and coassessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education,...
  • Domínguez-Lara, S. y Rodríguez, A. (2017). Statistical indices from bifactor models. Interacciones, 3(2), 59-65. https://doi.org/10.24016/2017....
  • Epskamp, S., Stuber, S., Nak, J., Veenman, M. y Jorgensen, T. D. (2019). semPlot: Path diagrams and visual analysis of various SEM packages’...
  • Erkan, E., Dimitriadis, Y. y GaÅ¡evi , E. (2021). A collaborative learning approach to dialogic peer feedback: A theoretical framework. Assessment...
  • Estriegana, R., Teixeira, A. M., Robina-Ramirez, R., Medina-Merodio, J.-A. y Otón, S. (2024). Impact of communication and relationships on...
  • Fang, J.-W., Chang, S.-C., Hwang, G.-J. y Yang, G. (2021). An online collaborative peer-assessment approach to strengthening pre-service teachers’...
  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. SAGE Publications. Filius, R. M., de Kleijn, R. A., Uijl, S. G., Prins, F. J., van Rijen,...
  • D. E. (2018). Strengthening dialogic peer feedback aiming for deep learning in SPOCs. Computers & Education, 125, 86-100. https://doi....
  • García-Celay, I. M. y León, O. G. (2005). Sistema de clasificación del método en los informes de investigación en Psicología. International...
  • Gaynor, J. W. (2020). Peer review in the classroom: Student perceptions, peer feedback quality and the role of assessment. Assessment &...
  • Green, S. B. y Yang, Y. (2009). Commentary on coefficient alpha: A cautionary tale. Psychometrika, 74(1), 121-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/...
  • Gregoire, J. (2018). ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (2 ed.). International Journal of Testing, 18(2), 101-134. https://doi.org/10.1080...
  • Gulledge, C. M., Smith, D. G., Ziedas, A., Muh, S. J., Moutzouros, V. y Makhni, E. C. (2019). Floor and ceiling effects, time to completion,...
  • Han, Y. y Xu, Y. (2020). The development of student feedback literacy: The influences of teacher feedback on peer feedback. Assessment &...
  • Hernández, A., Hidalgo, M. D., Hambleton, R. K. y Gómez-Benito, J. (2020). International Test Commission guidelines for test adaptation: A...
  • Hernández-Lalinde, J. D., Espinosa Castro, J. F., Peñaloza Tarazona, M. E., Fernández González, J. E., Chacón Rangel, J. G., Toloza Sierra,...
  • Hoo, H.-T., Deneen, C. y Boud, D. (2022). Developing student feedback literacy through self and peer assessment interventions. Assessment...
  • Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J. y van den Broek, P. (2018). Peer feedback on academic writing: Undergraduate students’ peer feedback...
  • Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J. y van den Broek, P. (2020). A questionnaire to assess students’ beliefs about peer-feedback. Innovations...
  • Hunzer, K. M. (2014). Collaborative learning and writing: Essays on using small groups in teaching English and composition. McFarland.
  • Hwang, G.-J., Zou, D. y Wu, Y.-X. (2023). Learning by storytelling and cri- tiquing: A peer assessment-enhanced digital storytelling approach...
  • Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S., Rodríguez-Gómez, G. y Boud, D. (2020). Developing student competence through peer assessment: The role of feedback, self-regulation...
  • Kasch, J., van Rosmalen, P., Löhr, A., Klemke, R., Antonaci, A. y Kalz, M. (2021). Students’ perceptions of the peer-feedback experience in...
  • Kaufman, J. H. y Schunn, C. D. (2011). Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: Their origin and impact on revision work....
  • Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4ª ed.). Guilford Publications.
  • Krause, K.-L., Hartley, R., James, R. y McInnis, C. (2005). The first year experience in Australian universities: Findings from a decade of...
  • Leary, M. R. (2008). Introduction to behavioral research methods (5ª ed.) Pearson.
  • Lerchenfeldt, S. y Taylor, T. A. H. (2020). Best practices in peer assessment: Training tomorrow’s physicians to obtain and provide quality...
  • McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410601087
  • Nicol, D., Thomson, A. y Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment &...
  • Panadero, E. y Alqassab, M. (2019). An empirical review of anonymity effects in peer assessment, peer feedback, peer review, peer evaluation...
  • Pinheiro, A., Rolim, V., Gasevic, D. y Ferreira, R. (2023). A comparative analysis between good feedback descriptors on online courses. Simposio...
  • Ramos, Z. (2018). Psicometría básica. Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina. Bogotá.
  • Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., Widaman, K. F. y Haviland, M. G. (2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation...
  • Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P. y Haviland, M. G. (2016). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological...
  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. https://doi. org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
  • Ruiz-Robledillo, N., Albaladejo-Blázquez, N., Clement-Carbonell, V., VelaBermejo, J., Rubio-Aparicio, M., Portilla-Tamarit, I., Costa-López,...
  • Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/...
  • Satorra, A., y Bentler, E. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard enors in covariance structure analysis. En A. von Eye y...
  • Schellekens, L. H., Bok, H. G. J., de Jong, L. H., van der Schaaf, M. F., Kremer, W. D. J. y van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2021). A scoping review...
  • Shui Ng, W. y Yu, G. (2021). Students’ attitude to peer assessment process: A critical factor for success. Interactive Learning Environments,...
  • Somervell, H. (1993). Issues in assessment, enterprise and higher education: The case for self-peer and collaborative assessment. Assessment...
  • Stucky, B. D., y Edelen, M. O. (2015). Using hierarchical IRT models to create unidimensional measures from multidimensional data. En S. P....
  • Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., y Edelen, M. O. (2013). Using logistic approximations of marginal trace lines to develop short assessments. Applied...
  • Su, W. y Huang, A. (2022). More enjoyable to give or to receive? Exploring students’ emotional status in their peer feedback of academic writing....
  • Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science...
  • The R Project for Statistical Computing. (2021). https://www.r-project.org/ index.html.
  • Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276. https://doi....
  • Tornwall, J., McGaughy, M. y Schubert, C. (2022). Peer review: Factors that motivate students to provide supportive peer feedback. Nurse Educator,...
  • Van Blankenstein, F. M., Dirkx, K. J. y de Bruycker, N. M. (2024). Ask your peer! How requests for peer feedback affect peer feedback responses....
  • Van Popta, E., Kral, M., Camp, G., Martens, R. L. y Simons, P. R.-J. (2017). Exploring the value of peer feedback in online learning for the...
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (2012). Thought and Language, revised and expanded edition. MIT Press.
  • Wood, J. (2021). A dialogic technology-mediated model of feedback uptake and literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(8),...
  • World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human...
  • Yu, S. y Liu, C. (2021). Improving student feedback literacy in academic writing: An evidence-based framework. Assessing Writing, 48, Article...
  • Zhan, Y. (2021). Are they ready? An investigation of university students’ difficulties in peer assessment from dual perspectives. Teaching...
  • Higher Education, 0(0), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021. 2021393
  • Zong, Z., Schunn, C. D. y Wang, Y. (2023). When do students provide more peer feedback? The roles of performance and prior feedback experiences....